Coronary wallstents show significant late, postprocedural expansion despite implantation with adjunct high-pressure balloon inflations
The American Journal of Cardiology 82(2): 129-134
Article 1998 English
Authors
CB
Clemens von Birgelen
SA
Segei G. Airiian
PF
Pim J. de Feyter
Abstract
1 min read
Adjunct high-pressure balloon inflations following the delivery of oversized self-expandable Wallstents may affect their implied late, postprocedural self-expansion. Consequently, we examined 15 “Magic” Wallstents, which were implanted following a strategy of stent oversizing and subsequent adjunct high-pressure balloon inflations (16 ± 2 atm; all ≥12 atm). The excellent radiographic visibility of this stent permitted reliable quantitative coronary angiographic measurement of both lumen and stent dimensions (before and after stenting, and at follow-up). At follow-up, extent and distribution of in-stent neointimal proliferation were evaluated with volumetric intravascular ultrasound. Between postintervention and follow-up examination, mean stent diameter increased from 3.7 ± 0.4 to 4.2 ± 0.4 mm (p <0.0001); there was no significant difference in late stent expansion between proximal, mid-, and distal stent subsegments. Late stent expansion showed a significant (reverse) relation to maximum balloon size (r = −0.56, p <0.04), but not with follow-up lumen size or late lumen loss. On average, 52 ± 18% of the stent was filled with neointimal ingrowth; neointimal volume/cm stent length was 64 ± 22 mm3. Both late stent expansion (r = 0.36, p <0.02) and maximum balloon pressure (r = 0.41, p <0.001) were related to neointimal volume/cm stent but not to follow-up lumen size. Thus, despite high-pressure implantation, Wallstents showed significant late self-expansion, which resulted in larger stent dimensions at follow-up that assisted in accommodating in-stent neointimal proliferation. Conversely, late stent expansion had a significant relation to the extent of in-stent neointimal ingrowth. Beneficial and disadvantageous effects of the late stent expansion appear to be balanced, because a relation to late lumen loss or follow-up lumen dimensions was not found to be present.
Peter de Jaegere, Patrick W. Serruys, Gerrit‐Anne van Es, Michel E. Bertrand, V. Wiegand, J. Marquis, Matthias Vrolicx, Jan Piessens, B Valeix, Gisbert Kober, W Rutsch, R. Uebis
Muzaffer Değertekin, Evelyn Regar, Kengo Tanabe, Pedro A. Lemos, Chi‐Hang Lee, Peter Smits, Pim de Feyter, Niko Bruining, Eduardo Sousa, Alexandre Abizaid, Jürgen Ligthart, Patrick W. Serruys
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.