Abstract
1 min readThe important role that political and economic
supports play in individuals' lives is often acknowledged, but less
often directly studied. The pervasive effects that these conditions
have on psychological processes related to individuals' well-being
is not fully understood. The present work reviews the literature
surrounding political and economic supports and social contexts
broadly defined, including the present understanding of human
wellness within these systems. The Primary Goods approach of John
Rawls and the Capabilities Approach of Amartya Sen and Martha
Nussbaum are considered as alternative conceptions of the
precursors of well-being most significant for comparative
assessments of justice. A wealth of evidence from the
Self-Determination Theory tradition provides a framework for
understanding such dynamics. Two studies provide a first test of
the capability approach, supporting the role of basic psychological
needs in mediating the relation between capabilities and
well-being. A third study measured both the capability approach and
primary goods models, their relation to broadened measures of
well-being, and the mediating role of basic psychological need
satisfaction, across a set of varied samples.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.