Complete responses (CR) in patients receiving atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) versus sorafenib (sor) in IMbrave150: A phase III clinical trial for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). — Richard S. Finn (2020) | RDL Network
Complete responses (CR) in patients receiving atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) versus sorafenib (sor) in IMbrave150: A phase III clinical trial for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Article 2020 en
Authors
RF
Richard S. Finn
SQ
Shukui Qin
MI
Masafumi Ikeda
Abstract
2 min read
4596 Background: In the Phase III IMbrave150 trial, statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS were seen with atezo + bev vs sor in pts with unresectable HCC who had not received prior systemic therapy (Cheng, ESMO Asia, 2019). Historically, CR rates have been low in HCC clinical trials. Here we report the baseline characteristics for IMbrave150 pts with a CR. Methods: IMbrave150 enrolled systemic treatment-naive pts with unresectable HCC. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezo 1200 mg IV q3w + bev 15 mg/kg IV q3w or sor 400 mg BID until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit per investigator. Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS by independent review facility (IRF)–assessed RECIST 1.1. The key secondary endpoints IRF ORR per RECIST 1.1 and IRF ORR per HCC mRECIST were also part of the study statistical testing hierarchy. Results: The ITT population included 336 pts randomized to atezo + bev and 165 pts randomized to sor. With a median follow-up of 8.6 mo (data cutoff, Aug 29, 2019), OS HR was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.79; P = 0.0006) and PFS HR was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.76; P < 0.0001) with atezo + bev vs sor. ORR was 27% vs 12% ( P < 0.0001) per IRF RECIST 1.1 and 33% vs 13% ( P < 0.0001) per IRF HCC mRECIST with atezo + bev vs sor, respectively. For responders (per IRF RECIST 1.1), median time to response was 2.8 mo (range, 1.2-11.3) with atezo + bev and 3.3 mo (range, 1.2-7.2) with sor. CR per IRF-assessed RECIST 1.1 was achieved by 18 pts in the atezo + bev arm and 0 pts in the sor arm. The baseline characteristics for atezo + bev CR pts are shown in the table. Additional characteristics will be shown. Conclusions: IMbrave150 demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both OS and PFS with atezo + bev vs sor in pts with unresectable HCC who have not received prior systemic therapy. Pts achieved CRs regardless of poor prognostic factors or etiology. Atezo + bev may be a practice-changing treatment for pts with unresectable HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03434379 . [Table: see text]
Riccardo Lencioni, Masatoshi Kudo, Richard S. Finn, Shukui Qin, Kwang–Hyub Han, Kenji Ikeda, Ann‐Lii Cheng, Fabio Piscaglia, Guohong Han, Masafumi Ikeda, Krzysztof Simon, Д. В. Комов, Xuenong Ouyang, T.R. Jeffry Evans, Max W. Sung, Terri A. Binder, Andrew Damon, Silvija Kraljevic, Min Ren, Baek‐Yeol Ryoo
Josep M. Llovet, Serafino Ricci, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, P Hilgard, Jean‐Luc Raoul, Stefan Zeuzem, Melanie Poulin-Costello, M. Moscovici, D. Voliotis, Jordi Bruix
Ann‐Lii Cheng, Richard S. Finn, Shukui Qin, Kwang–Hyub Han, Kenji Ikeda, Fabio Piscaglia, Ari David Baron, Joong‐Won Park, Guohong Han, Jacek Jassem, Jean–Frédéric Blanc, Arndt Vogel, Д. В. Комов, T.R. Jeffry Evans, Carlos López, Corina E. Dutcus, Min Ren, Silvija Kraljevic, Toshiyuki Tamai, Masatoshi Kudo
Masatoshi Kudo, Thomas Yau, Thomas Decaens, Bruno Sangro, Shukui Qin, Leonardo Gomes da Fonseca, Hatim Karachiwala, Joong‐Won Park, Edward Gane, Matthias Pinter, David Tai, Armando Santoro, Gonzalo Pizarro, Chang‐Fang Chiu, Michael Schenker, Aiwu Ruth He, Nan Hu, Maria Jesus Jimenez Exposito, Caitlyn Stromko, Peter R. Galle
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.