Comparison of cellulose diacetate and polysulfone membranes in the outcome of acute renal failure. A prospective randomized study — Karine Gastaldello (2000) | RDL Network
Comparison of cellulose diacetate and polysulfone membranes in the outcome of acute renal failure. A prospective randomized study
Article 2000 en
Authors
KG
Karine Gastaldello
CM
Christian Mélot
RK
R. J. Kahn
Abstract
1 min read
Among patients with ARF requiring HD survival and recovery time are not significantly influenced by the use of either meltspun cellulose diacetate or the more biocompatible high-flux or low-flux polysulfone. Dialysis using modified cellulose membranes is just as effective as dialysis using synthetic polysulfone membranes, but at a lower cost. In addition, the flux of the membrane did not influence patient outcome.
Retno Ariadi Lusiana, Nurwarrohman Andre Sasongko, Vivi Dia A. Sangkota, Nor Basid Adiwibawa Prasetya, Parsaoran Siahaan, Agung Abadi Kiswandono, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman
Abdullah Mohamed Asiri, Francesco Petrosino, Valerio Pugliese, Sher Bahadar Khan, Khalid A. Alamry, Soliman Y. Alfifi, Hadi M. Marwani, Maha M. Alotaibi, Catia Algieri, Sudip Chakraborty
Heinz Ludwig, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Evangelos Terpos, Sarah Bernhard, Foteini Theodorakakou, Meral Beksac, Güldane Cengiz Seval, Nelson Leung, Luca Arcaini, Silvia Mangiacavalli, Frank Bridoux, Hermine Agis, Aristeidis Chaidos, Francesca Gay, Dario Roccatello, Wolfgang Hilbe, Andrea Havasi, Daniele Derudas, Nattawat Klomjit, Kenar D. Jhaveri, Javier de la Rubia Comos, Efstathios Kastritis
Sumarni Mansur, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman, Ahmad Fauzi Ismail, Muhammad Nidzhom Zainol Abidin, Noresah Said, Pei Sean Goh, Hasrinah Hasbullah, Siti Hamimah Sheikh Abdul Kadir, Fatmawati Kamal
Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.