Comparing laser-based open- and closed-path gas analyzers to measure methane fluxes using the eddy covariance method

Matteo Detto; Joseph Verfaillie; Frank E. Anderson; Liukang Xu; Dennis Baldocchi

doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.05.014

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2017

Evaluation of Density Corrections to Methane Fluxes Measured by Open-Path Eddy Covariance over Contrasting Landscapes

Samuel D. Chamberlain, Joseph Verfaillie, Elke Eichelmann, Kyle S. Hemes, Dennis Baldocchi

Article2019

Gap‐filling approaches for eddy covariance methane fluxes: A comparison of three machine learning algorithms and a traditional method with principal component analysis

Yeonuk Kim, Mark S. Johnson, Sara Knox, T. Andrew Black, Higo J. Dalmagro, Minseok Kang, Joon Kim, Dennis Baldocchi

Article2010

Eddy Covariance Measured Methane and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes for a Restored Wetland, Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta, California, USA

Frank E. Anderson, Matteo Detto, Joseph Verfaillie, J. Hatala, Dennis Baldocchi, Brian A. Bergamaschi, Roger Fujii

Article2021

Gap-filling eddy covariance methane fluxes: Comparison of machine learning model predictions and uncertainties at FLUXNET-CH4 wetlands

Jeremy Irvin, Sharon Zhou, Gavin McNicol, Fred Lu, Vincent Liu, Etienne Fluet‐Chouinard, Zutao Ouyang, Sara Knox, Antje Lucas-Moffat, Carlo Trotta, Dario Papale, Domenico Vitale, Ivan Mammarella, Pavel Alekseychik, Mika Aurela, Anand Avati, Dennis Baldocchi, Sheel Bansal, Gil Bohrer, David I. Campbell, Jiquan Chen, Housen Chu, Higo J. Dalmagro,

Article2014

Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere – the state and future of the eddy covariance method

Dennis Baldocchi