Clustering of malaria in households in the Greater Mekong Subregion: operational implications for reactive case detection — Mavuto Mukaka (2021) | RDL Network
Clustering of malaria in households in the Greater Mekong Subregion: operational implications for reactive case detection
Malaria Journal 20(1)
Article 2021 English
Authors
MM
Mavuto Mukaka
PP
Pimnara Peerawaranun
DP
Daniel M. Parker
Abstract
2 min read
Malaria reactive case detection is the testing and, if positive, treatment of close contacts of index cases. It is included in national malaria control programmes of countries in the Greater Mekong Subregion to accelerate malaria elimination. Yet the value of reactive case detection in the control and elimination of malaria remains controversial because of the low yield, limited evidence for impact, and high demands on resources.Data from the epidemiological assessments of large mass drug administration (MDA) studies in Myanmar, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos were analysed to explore malaria infection clustering in households. The proportion of malaria positive cases among contacts screened in a hypothetical reactive case detection programme was then determined. The parasite density thresholds for rapid diagnostic test (RDT) detection was assumed to be > 50/µL (50,000/mL), for dried-blood-spot (DBS) based PCR > 5/µL (5000/mL), and for ultrasensitive PCR (uPCR) with a validated limit of detection at 0.0022/µL (22/mL).At baseline, before MDA, 1223 Plasmodium infections were detected by uPCR in 693 households. There was clustering of Plasmodium infections. In 637 households with asymptomatic infections 44% (278/637) had more than one member with Plasmodium infections. In the 132 households with symptomatic infections, 65% (86/132) had more than one member with Plasmodium infections. At baseline 4% of households had more than one Plasmodium falciparum infection, but three months after MDA no household had more than one P. falciparum infected member. Reactive case detection using DBS PCR would have detected ten additional cases in six households, and an RDT screen would have detected five additional cases in three households among the 169 households with at least one RDT positive case. This translates to 19 and 9 additional cases identified per 1000 people screened, respectively. Overall, assuming all febrile RDT positive patients would seek treatment and provoke reactive case detection using RDTs, then 1047 of 1052 (99.5%) Plasmodium infections in these communities would have remained undetected.Reactive case detection in the Greater Mekong subregion is predicted to have a negligible impact on the malaria burden, but it has substantial costs in terms of human and financial resources.
Rupam Tripura, Thomas J. Peto, Christianne C. A. F. M. Veugen, Chea Nguon, Chan Davoeung, Nicola James, Mehul Dhorda, Richard J. Maude, Jureeporn Duanguppama, Krittaya Patumrat, Mallika Imwong, Lorenz von Seidlein, Martin P. Grobusch, Sir Nicholas White, Arjen M. Dondorp
Pimnara Peerawaranun, Jordi Landier, François Nosten, Thuy-Nhien Nguyen, Tran Tinh Hien, Rupam Tripura, Thomas J. Peto, Koukeo Phommasone, Mayfong Mayxay, Nicholas Day, Arjen M. Dondorp, Sir Nicholas White, Lorenz von Seidlein, Mavuto Mukaka
Koukeo Phommasone, Bipin Adhikari, Gisela Henriques, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Panom Phongmany, Lorenz von Seidlein, Sir Nicholas White, Nicholas Day, Arjen M. Dondorp, Paul N. Newton, Mallika Imwong, Mayfong Mayxay
Mallika Imwong, Wanassanan Madmanee, Kanokon Suwannasin, Chanon Kunasol, Thomas J. Peto, Rupam Tripura, Lorenz von Seidlein, Chea Nguon, Chan Davoeung, Nicholas Day, Arjen M. Dondorp, Sir Nicholas White
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.