The final discussion session of the Newcastle Earthquake Conference outlines changes that need to be made in relation to earthquake engineering, hazard analysis, and response. The recommendations are based on a broad feeling of consensus by conference participants. The discussion also includes feedback of problems currently facing industry and civic professionals involved in the Newcastle earthquake of 1989., i.e insurance assessment, continuing ground movement, demolishment vs. repair, and the public perception of engineers.
Travis J. Saunders, Scott Rollo, Nicholas Kuzik, Iryna Demchenko, Stacey A Bélanger, Kara Brisson‐Boivin, Valerie Carson, Bruno Gonçalves Galdino da Costa, Melanie Davis, Susan Hornby, Yajun Huang, Barbi Law, Michelle Ponti, Chris Markham, Jo Salmon, Jennifer R. Tomasone, Antonius J. van Rooij, Lucy-Joy Wachira, Katrien Wijndaele, Mark S. Tremblay
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
William T. Cefalu, Andrew J.M. Boulton, William V. Tamborlane, Robert G. Moses, Derek LeRoith, Eddie L. Greene, Frank B Hu, George L. Bakris, Judith Wylie‐Rosett, Julio Rosenstock, Katie Weinger, Lawrence Blonde, Mary de Groot, Matthew C. Riddle, Robert R. Henry, Sherita Hill Golden, Stephen S. Rich, L. Raymond Reynolds
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.