Clinical research diagnostic criteria for bipolar illness (CRDC-BP): rationale and validity

S. Nassir Ghaemi; Jules Angst; Paul A. Vöhringer; Eric A. Youngstrom; James Phelps; Philip B. Mitchell; Roger S. McIntyre; Michael Bauer; Eduard Vieta; Samuel Gershon

doi:10.1186/s40345-022-00267-3

Back

Clinical research diagnostic criteria for bipolar illness (CRDC-BP): rationale and validity

Article 2022 en

Abstract

1 min read

A new CRDC could provide guidance toward an empirically-based, scientific psychiatric nosology, and provide an alternative clinical diagnostic approach to the DSM system.

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2014

An integrative approach to psychiatric diagnosis and research

Dan Joseph Stein

Chapter in a book2016

A Novel Framework for Improving Psychiatric Diagnostic Nosology

Shelly B. Flagel, Daniel S. Pine, Susanne E. Ahmari, Michael B. First, Karl Friston, Christoph Mathys, A. David Redish, Katharina Schmack, Jordan W. Smoller, Anita Thapar

Chapter in a book2006

Diagnosis and classification

Francesc Colom, Eduard Vieta, Jan Scott

Article2009

Overinterpretation of Clinical Applicability in Molecular Diagnostic Research

Blanca Lumbreras, Lucy Anne Parker, Miquel Porta, Marina Pollán, John P A Ioannidis, Ildefonso Hernández‐Aguado

Preprint2022

Research and Diagnostic Algorithmic Rules (RADAR) for mood disorders, recurrence of illness, suicidal behaviors, and the patient’s lifetime trajectory

Michael Maes, Juliana Brum Moraes, Ana Congio, Heber Odebrecht Vargas, Sandra Odebrecht Vargas Nunes