Circumferential distribution of the neointima at six-month and two-year follow-up after a bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: a substudy of the ABSORB Cohort B Clinical Trial — Christos V. Bourantas (2015) | RDL Network
Circumferential distribution of the neointima at six-month and two-year follow-up after a bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: a substudy of the ABSORB Cohort B Clinical Trial
EuroIntervention 10(11): 1299-1306
Article 2015 English
Authors
CB
Christos V. Bourantas
VF
Vasim Farooq
YZ
Yao‐Jun Zhang
Abstract
1 min read
To investigate the extent and the circumferential distribution of the neointima tissue developed following an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation.Twenty-three patients who were treated with the Absorb BVS and had optical coherence tomographic examination after scaffold implantation, at six-month and at two-year follow-up, were included in the current analysis. The lumen and the scaffold borders were detected and the circumferential thickness of the neointima was measured at one degree intervals. The symmetry of the neointima was defined as: minimum/maximum thickness. The lumen area was decreased at six months compared to baseline but it did not change between six-month and two-year follow-up (baseline: 7.49 [6.13-8.00] mm², six months: 6.31 (4.75-7.06) mm², two years: 6.01 [4.67-7.11] mm², p=0.373). However, the mean neointima thickness (six months: 189 [173-229] m, two years: 258 [222-283] m, p<0.0001) and the symmetry index of the neointima (six months: 0.06 [0.02-0.09], two years: 0.27 [0.24-0.36], p<0.0001) were increased at two years. Full circumferential coverage of the vessel wall by neointima tissue was seen in 91% of the studied frames at two years.This study demonstrates that after an Absorb BVS implantation neointima tissue develops that covers almost the whole circumference of the vessel wall. In contrast to the metallic stents, the neointima tissue does not compromise the luminal dimensions. Further research is required to evaluate the neointimal characteristics and assess the potential value of the device in passivating high-risk plaques.
Salvatore Brugaletta, Maria Radu, Héctor M. García‐García, Jung Ho Heo, Vasim Farooq, Chrysafios Girasis, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Leif Thuesen, Dougal McClean, Bernard Chevalier, Stephan Windecker, Jacques Koolen, Richard Rapoza, Karine Miquel‐Hébert, John A. Ormiston, Patrick W. Serruys
Bill D. Gogas, Patrick W. Serruys, Roberto Diletti, Vasim Farooq, Salvatore Brugaletta, Maria Radu, Jung Ho Heo, Yoshinobu Onuma, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Evelyn Regar, Bernard De Bruyne, Bernard Chevalier, Leif Thuesen, Pieter C. Smits, Dariusz Dudek, Jacques Koolen, Stefan Windecker, Robert Whitbourn, Karine Miquel‐Hébert, Cécile Dorange, Richard Rapoza,
Roberto Diletti, Yoshinobu Onuma, Vasim Farooq, Josep Gómez‐Lara, Salvatore Brugaletta, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Evelyn Regar, Bernard De Bruyne, Dariusz Dudek, Leif Thuesen, Bernard Chevalier, Dougal McClean, Stephan Windecker, Robert Whitbourn, Pieter C. Smits, Jacques Koolen, Ian T. Meredith, Dong Li, Susan Veldhof, Richard Rapoza, Héctor M. García‐García, John A. Ormiston,
Gregg W. Stone, Alexandre Abizaid, Yoshinobu Onuma, Ashok Seth, Runlin Gao, John A. Ormiston, Takeshi Kimura, Bernard Chevalier, Ori Ben‐Yehuda, Ovidiu Dressler, Tom McAndrew, Stephen G. Ellis, Dean J. Kereiakes, Patrick W. Serruys
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.