Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ekosistem
Uygulama değiştir
EN
Hakkımızda
SSS
Giriş yap
Başla
Characterising the complexity of neuronal interactions — Karl Friston (1995) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Characterising the complexity of neuronal interactions
Shared by
Karl Friston
University College London, University of London
Characterising the complexity of neuronal interactions
Article
1995
en
Authors
+1 more
Karl Friston
University College London
GT
Giulio Tononi
OS
Olaf Sporns
Abstract
2 min read
Abstract This work addresses the complexity of neuronal interactions, the nature of this complexity and how it can be characterised in real neurophysiological processes. A measure of complexity has been introduced recently (Tononi et al. [1994]: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5033–5037) that is sensitive to the joint constraints imposed by two principles of brain organisation: functional segregation and functional integration. Functional segregation implies that the dynamics of a cortical area should reflect the multidimensional attributes for which that area is specialised (in other words, regional dynamics should show a relatively high entropy). Conversely, functional integration implies a distributed and divergent influence of every cortical area on the remaining areas (i.e., the overall dynamics should show a low entropy). Our measure is based on the profile of entropies of different sized regions of the brain. Complexity is high when smaller regions have (on average) a relatively high entropy with respect to the entropy of the whole system. This measure is equivalent to the (average) mutual information between all small regions and the rest of the system in question. We have applied this measure to nonlinear simulations and to neurophysiological data obtained with fMRI during photic stimulation. Because patterns of activity in the brain are intermediate between a state of incoherence, with regionally specific dynamics and a state of global coherence, we predicted that simulated nonlinear processes with similar characteristics would have a high complexity. In the language of nonlinear dynamics we hypothesised that the greatest complexity would be found somewhere between high‐dimensional, chaotic behaviour and low‐dimensional, orderly behaviour. Equivalently, using the metaphor of loosely coupled oscillators, we predicted that complexity would be highest in the domain between asynchronous oscillations and global synchrony. This hypothesis was confirmed using nonlinear neuronal simulations. In addition, we demonstrate that the complexity of neurophysiological data is easily measured and can show a significant complexity when compared to suitable control processes. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Preprint
2022
Selection entropy: the information hidden within neuronal patterns
Erik D. Fagerholm
,
Zalina Dezhina
,
Rosalyn Moran
,
Karl Friston
,
Federico Turkheimer
,
Robert Leech
Article
2001
Book Review: Brain Function, Nonlinear Coupling, and Neuronal Transients
Karl Friston
Article
2000
The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling
Karl Friston
Preprint
2019
Dynamic causal modelling of phase-amplitude interactions
Erik D. Fagerholm
,
Rosalyn Moran
,
Inês R. Violante
,
Robert Leech
,
Karl Friston
Preprint
2019
Dynamic causal modelling of phase-amplitude interactions
Erik D. Fagerholm
,
Rosalyn Moran
,
Inês R. Violante
,
Robert Leech
,
Karl Friston
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.