The relevance ranking provided by the search engine was better than expected by chance and shows promise for the preliminary evaluation of large results from Boolean searches. A statistical search engine does not appear to be able to make fine discriminations concerning the relevance of bibliographic records that have been pre-screened by systematic reviewers.
Daniel G. Hamilton, Joanne E. McKenzie, Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Steve McDonald, Sue Brennan, Fiona Fidler, Julian P. T. Higgins, Raju Kanukula, Sathya Karunananthan, Lara Maxwell, David Moher, Shinichi Nakagawa, David Nunan, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Matthew J. Page
Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Sara Schroter, L.M. Bouter, Jamie J Kirkham, David Moher, David Blanco, Ana Patricia Ayala, Tara Brigham, Holly K. Grossetta Nardini, Shona Kirtley, Kate Nyhan, Maurice P. Zeegers
.webp)
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.