Blinded versus unblinded assessments of risk-of-bias in studies included in a systematic review

David Moher; Tanya Horsley; Kate Morgan; Andrea C. Tricco; Alexander Tsertsvadze

doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000025

Abstract

1 min read

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Methodology). The objectives are as follows: To determine if blinded and unblinded assessments of risk‐of‐bias result in similar or systematically different assessments in studies included in a SR.

Related publications

Article2011

Blinded versus unblinded assessments of risk of bias in studies included in a systematic review

Kate Morissette, Andrea C. Tricco, Tanya Horsley, Maggie H Chen, David Moher

Article2013

Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews: The why is Easy, the how is a Challenge

Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Isabelle Boutron, Lucy Turner, Douglas G. Altman, David Moher

Article2020

Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies

Myura Nagendran, Yang Chen, Christopher A. Lovejoy, Anthony Gordon, Matthieu Komorowski, Hugh Harvey, Eric J. Topol, John P A Ioannidis, Gary S. Collins, Mahiben Maruthappu

Article2017

How health equity is reported and analyzed in randomized trials

Jennifer Petkovic, Vivian Welch, Janet Jull, Mark Petticrew, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Tamara Rader, Manosila Yoganathan, Jessie McGowan, Anne Lyddiatt, Jeremy Grimshaw, Jimmy Volmink, David Moher, Beverley Shea, Kevin Pottie, Tomás Pantoja, George A. Wells, Peter Tugwell

Article2014

Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection

Ingrid Eshun‐Wilson, Dickens Akena, Nandi Siegfried, Ekwaro A. Obuku, Dan Joseph Stein, John A. Joska