BIPHASIC ENERGY CONVERSION KINETICS AND ABSORBANCE DIFFERENCE SPECTRA OF PHOTOSYSTEM II OF CHLOROPLASTS. EVIDENCE FOR TWO DIFFERENT PHOTOSYSTEM II REACTION CENTERS

Abstract— The continuous illumination induced kinetics of photochemical energy conversion at system II have been measured with isolated and 3‐(3, 4‐dichlorophenyl)‐l, l‐dimethylurea (DCMU) poisoned chloroplasts by means of absorbance difference spectroscopy in the UV and by the area growth over the fluorescence induction curve at room temperature. An optimal set of conditions was found in order to isolate absorbance changes caused by the reduction of the primary electron acceptor Q of PS II by suppressing other electron transfer processes. The light induced kinetics of Q‐ accumulation in the absorbance change measurements were found to be biphasic and strictly correlated with the kinetics of the area growth measured under the same conditions. From the resolution of the biphasic kinetics at different wavelengths in the UV region of the spectrum, it was found that both kinetic components in the system II photochemistry involve the reduction of a plastoquinone molecule to its plastosemiquinone anion. From the two kinetic components one was fast and non‐exponential and the other relatively slow with an exponential time course. The initial rate difference in the kinetics of the two components was by a factor of approximately 3. A difference by a factor of about three was also found in the flash saturation curves of the two kinetic components. The results are explained by the hypothesis that in higher plant chloroplasts there are system II reaction centers embedded in a large pigment matrix with statistical energy transfer, and system II reaction centers embedded in separate, in terms of excitation energy transfer, units. The effective absorption cross section per reaction center for the centers in the statistical pigment bed is approximately 3 times larger than that of the reaction centers in the separate system II units. The two types of system II reaction centers have different yields of excitation trapping and charge stabilization properties.