Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple\n sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks
Preprint 2018 en
Authors
CG
Charley Gros
BL
Benjamin De Leener
AB
Atef Badji
Abstract
1 min read
The spinal cord is frequently affected by atrophy and/or lesions in multiple\nsclerosis (MS) patients. Segmentation of the spinal cord and lesions from MRI\ndata provides measures of damage, which are key criteria for the diagnosis,\nprognosis, and longitudinal monitoring in MS. Automating this operation\neliminates inter-rater variability and increases the efficiency of\nlarge-throughput analysis pipelines. Robust and reliable segmentation across\nmulti-site spinal cord data is challenging because of the large variability\nrelated to acquisition parameters and image artifacts. The goal of this study\nwas to develop a fully-automatic framework, robust to variability in both image\nparameters and clinical condition, for segmentation of the spinal cord and\nintramedullary MS lesions from conventional MRI data. Scans of 1,042 subjects\n(459 healthy controls, 471 MS patients, and 112 with other spinal pathologies)\nwere included in this multi-site study (n=30). Data spanned three contrasts\n(T1-, T2-, and T2*-weighted) for a total of 1,943 volumes. The proposed cord\nand lesion automatic segmentation approach is based on a sequence of two\nConvolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). To deal with the very small proportion of\nspinal cord and/or lesion voxels compared to the rest of the volume, a first\nCNN with 2D dilated convolutions detects the spinal cord centerline, followed\nby a second CNN with 3D convolutions that segments the spinal cord and/or\nlesions. When compared against manual segmentation, our CNN-based approach\nshowed a median Dice of 95% vs. 88% for PropSeg, a state-of-the-art spinal cord\nsegmentation method. Regarding lesion segmentation on MS data, our framework\nprovided a Dice of 60%, a relative volume difference of -15%, and a lesion-wise\ndetection sensitivity and precision of 83% and 77%, respectively. The proposed\nframework is open-source and readily available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox.\n
Anne Kerbrat, Gilles Edan, Pierre Labauge, Virginie Callot, Jean Pelletier, Bertrand Audoin, Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina, Jean‐Christophe Brisset, Paola Valsasina, Maria A. Rocca, Massimo Filippi, Rohit Bakshi, Shahamat Tauhid, Ferrán Prados, Marios Yiannakas, Hugh Kearney, Olga Ciccarelli, Seth A. Smith, Constantina A. Treaba, Caterina Mainero, Jennifer Lefeuvre, Daniel S. Reich, Govind Nair, Timothy M. Shepherd, Erik Charlson, Yasuhiko Tachibana, Masaaki Hori, Kouhei Kamiya, Lydia Chougar, Sridar Narayanan, Julien Cohen‐Adad, Dominique Eden, Charley Gros, Atef Badji, Sara M. Dupont, Benjamin De Leener, Josefina Maranzano, Ren Zhuoquiong, Yaou Liu, Tobias Granberg, Russell Ouellette, Leszek Stawiarz, Jan Hillert, Jason F. Talbott, Élise Bannier
Laura Cacciaguerra, Ajay A. Madhavan, Sean J Pittock, Brian G. Weinshenker, W. Oliver Tobin, Mark Keegan, Jan‐Mendelt Tillema, Burcu Zeydan, John J. Chen, Massimo Filippi, Maria A. Rocca, Karl N. Krecke, Orhun H. Kantarci, Eoin P. Flanagan
Anne Kerbrat, Charley Gros, Atef Badji, Élise Bannier, Francesca Galassi, Benoît Combès, Raphaël Chouteau, Pierre Labauge, Xavier Ayrignac, Clarisse Carra‐Dallière, Josefina Maranzano, Tobias Granberg, Russell Ouellette, Leszek Stawiarz, Jan Hillert, Jason F. Talbott, Yasuhiko Tachibana, Masaaki Hori, Kouhei Kamiya, Lydia Chougar, Jennifer Lefeuvre, Daniel S. Reich, Govind Nair, ,
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.