Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
Asymmetric one‐storey elastic systems with non‐linear viscous and viscoelastic dampers: Earthquake response — Wen‐Hsiung Lin (2003) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Asymmetric one‐storey elastic systems with non‐linear viscous and viscoelastic dampers: Earthquake response
Shared by
Anil K Chopra
University of California, Berkeley
Asymmetric one‐storey elastic systems with non‐linear viscous and viscoelastic dampers: Earthquake response
Article
2003
en
Authors
WL
Wen‐Hsiung Lin
Anil K Chopra
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
2 min read
Abstract Investigated are earthquake responses of one‐way symmetric‐plan, one‐storey systems with non‐linear fluid viscous dampers (FVDs) attached in series to a linear brace (i.e. Chevron or inverted V‐shape braces).Thus, the non‐linear damper is viscous when the brace is considered rigid or viscoelastic (VE) when the brace is flexible. The energy dissipation capacity of a non‐linear FVD is characterized by an amplitude‐dependent damping ratio for an energy‐equivalent linear FVD, which is determined assuming the damper undergoes harmonic motion. Although this formulation is shown to be advantageous for single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDF) systems, it is difficult to extend its application to multi‐degree‐of‐freedom (MDF) systems for two reasons: (1) the assumption that dampers undergo harmonic motion in parameterizing the non‐linear damper is not valid for its earthquake‐induced motion of an MDF system; and (2) ensuring simultaneous convergence of all unknown amplitudes of dampers is difficult in an iterative solution of the non‐linear system. To date, these limitations have precluded the parametric study of the dynamics of MDF systems with non‐linear viscous or VE dampers. However, they are overcome in this investigation using concepts of modal analysis because the system is weakly non‐linear due to supplemental damping. It is found that structural response is only weakly affected by damper non‐linearity and is increased by a small amount due to bracing flexibility. Thus, the effectiveness of supplemental damping in reducing structural responses and its dependence on the planwise distribution of non‐linear VE dampers were found to be similar to that of linear FVDs documented elsewhere. As expected, non‐linear viscous and VE dampers achieve essentially the same reduction in response but with much smaller damper force compared to linear dampers. Finally, the findings in this investigation indicate that the earthquake response of the asymmetric systems with non‐linear viscous or VE dampers can be estimated with sufficient accuracy for design applications by analysing the same asymmetric systems with all non‐linear dampers replaced by energy‐equivalent linear viscous dampers. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
2003
Asymmetric one‐storey elastic systems with non‐linear viscous and viscoelastic dampers: Simplified analysis and supplemental damping system design
Wen‐Hsiung Lin
,
Anil K Chopra
Article
2002
Earthquake response of elastic SDF systems with non‐linear fluid viscous dampers
Wen‐Hsiung Lin
,
Anil K Chopra
Article
2003
Earthquake Response of Elastic Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems with Nonlinear Viscoelastic Dampers
Wen‐Hsiung Lin
,
Anil K Chopra
Article
2001
Understanding and predicting effects of supplemental viscous damping on seismic response of asymmetric one‐storey systems
Wen‐Hsiung Lin
,
Anil K Chopra
Article
2016
Probabilistic economic seismic loss estimation in steel buildings using post‐tensioned moment‐resisting frames and viscous dampers
Athanasios I. Dimopoulos
,
Angelos S. Tzimas
,
Theodore L. Karavasilis
,
Vamvatsikos Dimitrios I.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.