Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence? — David Moher (2016) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?
Editorial Material
2016
en
Authors
DM
David Moher
SG
Steven N. Goodman
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
2021
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in faculties of medicine: a cross-sectional study of the Canadian U15 universities
Danielle B. Rice
,
Hana Raffoul
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
David Moher
Article
2018
Academic Criteria for Promotion and Tenure Within the Faculty of Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study of 170 Universities
Hana Raffoul
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
Danielle B. Rice
,
David Moher
Article
2020
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities
Danielle B. Rice
,
Hana Raffoul
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
David Moher
Preprint
2019
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in faculties of biomedical sciences: a cross-sectional analysis of 146 universities
Danielle B. Rice
,
Hana Raffoul
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
David Moher
Article
2016
The Use of Enhanced Appointment Access Strategies by Medical Practices
Hector P. Rodríguez
,
Margae Knox
,
Vanessa B. Hurley
,
Diane R. Rittenhouse
,
Stephen M Shortell
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.