Judgments of risk and judgments of benefit have been found to be inversely related. Activities or technologies that are judged high in risk tend to be judged low in benefit, and vice versa. In the present study, we examine this inverse relationship in detail, using two measures of relationship between risk and benefit. We find that the inverse relationship is robust and indicative of a confounding of risk and benefit in people's minds. This confounding is linked to a person's overall evaluation of an activity or technology. Theoretical and practical implications of this risk‐benefit confounding are discussed.
Gordon Fehringer, Darren R. Brenner, Zuo‐Feng Zhang, Yuan‐Chin Amy Lee, Keitaro Matsuo, Hidemi Ito, Qing Lan, Paolo Vineis, Mattias Johansson, Kim Overvad, Elio Riboli, Antonia Trichopoulou, Carlotta Sacerdote, Isabelle Stücker, Paolo Boffetta, Paul Brennan, David C. Christiani, Yun‐Chul Hong, Maria Teresa Landi, Hal Morgenstern, Ann G. Schwartz, Angela S. Wenzlaff,
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.