A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials

Anthony Chauvin; David Moher; Doug Altman; David L. Schriger; Sabina Alam; Sally Hopewell; Daniel Shanahan; Alessandro Recchioni; Philippe Ravaud; Isabelle Boutron

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017462

Related publications

Article2011

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Julian P. T. Higgins, Doug Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche, Peter Jüni, David Moher, Andrew D Oxman, Jelena Savović, Kenneth F. Schulz, Laura Weeks, Jonathan A C Sterne

Article2022

Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: a cross-sectional study protocol

Olivier Brandts‐Longtin, Manoj M. Lalu, Euan Adie, Marc A. Albert, Elham Almoli, Faris Almoli, Gregory L. Bryson, Christophe Dony, Daniel J. Dunleavy, Agnes Grudniewicz, Christine Lehmann, Rémy Lhoest, David Moher, Joshua Montroy, Mallory S. Pitts, Alicia Ricketts, Paul Thirion, Kelly D. Cobey

Article1999

Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.

David Moher, Cook, Jadad, Peter Tugwell, Moher, Jones, Pham, Klassen

Article1998

CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials

David Moher

Preprint2025

Educational intervention For Open Science (Educ4OS) practices promotion: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial in early career researchers – Study Protocol

Jaisson Cenci, David Moher, Anelise Fernandes Montagner, Marcos Britto Corrêa, Thiago Machado Ardenghi, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Ahmad Sofi‐Mahmudi, Daniela Prócida Raggio, María Gabriela Haye Biazevic, Mariana Minatel Braga, L.M. Bouter, M.C.D.N.J.M. Huysmans, Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci