A 3% SOLUTION: DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT WITH THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>AND WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3
Article 2011 en
Authors
AR
Adam G. Riess
LM
Lucas M. Macri
SC
Stefano Casertano
Abstract
1 min read
We use the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) on the Hubble Space Telescope to\ndetermine the Hubble constant (H0) from optical and infrared observations of\nover 600 Cepheid variables in the host galaxies of 8 recent Type Ia supernovae\n(SNe Ia), providing the calibration for a mag-z relation of 253 SNe Ia.\nIncreased precision over past measurements comes from: (1) more than doubling\nthe number of infrared observations of Cepheids in nearby SN hosts; (2)\nincreasing the sample of ideal SN Ia calibrators from six to eight; (3)\nincreasing by 20% the number of Cepheids with infrared observations in the\nmegamaser host NGC 4258; (4) reducing the difference in the mean metallicity of\nthe Cepheid comparison samples from \\Delta log [O/H] = 0.08 to 0.05; and (5)\ncalibrating all optical Cepheid colors with one camera, WFC3, to remove\ncross-instrument zero-point errors. Uncertainty in H0 from beyond the 1st rung\nof the distance ladder is reduced from 3.5% to 2.3%. The measurement of H0 via\nthe geometric distance to NGC 4258 is 74.8 \\pm 3.1 km s- 1 Mpc-1, a 4.1%\nmeasurement including systematics. Better precision independent of NGC 4258\ncomes from two alternative Cepheid absolute calibrations: (1) 13 Milky Way\nCepheids with parallaxes and (2) 92 Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud with\nmultiple eclipsing binary distances, yielding 74.4 \\pm 2.5 km s- 1 Mpc-1, a\n3.4% uncertainty with systematics. Our best estimate uses all three\ncalibrations but a larger uncertainty afforded from any two: H0 = 73.8 \\pm 2.4\nkm s- 1 Mpc-1 including systematics, a 3.3% uncertainty. The improvement in H0,\ncombined with WMAP7yr data, results in a constraint on the EOS parameter of\ndark energy of w = -1.08 \\pm 0.10 and Neff = 4.2 \\pm 0.7 for the number of\nrelativistic species in the early universe. It also rules out the best-fitting\ngigaparsec-scale void models, posited as an alternative to dark energy.\n(abridged)\n
Adam G. Riess, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M. Macri, D. Scolnic, Dillon Brout, Stefano Casertano, D. O. Jones, Yukei S. Murakami, Louise Breuval, Thomas G. Brink, Alexei V Filippenko, Samantha Hoffmann, Saurabh W. Jha, W. D. Kenworthy, John MacKenty, Benjamin E. Stahl, WeiKang Zheng
Adam G. Riess, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M. Macri, D. Scolnic, Dillon Brout, Stefano Casertano, D. O. Jones, Yukei S. Murakami, Gagandeep S. Anand, Louise Breuval, Thomas G. Brink, Alexei V Filippenko, Samantha Hoffmann, Saurabh W. Jha, W. D. Kenworthy, John Mackenty, Benjamin E. Stahl, WeiKang Zheng
Adam G. Riess, Lucas M. Macri, Stefano Casertano, M. Sosey, Hubert Lampeitl, Henry C. Ferguson, Alexei V Filippenko, Saurabh W. Jha, Weidong Li, R. Chornock, D. Sarkar
Adam G. Riess, Siyang Li, Gagandeep S. Anand, Wenlong Yuan, Louise Breuval, Stefano Casertano, Lucas M. Macri, D. Scolnic, Yukei S. Murakami, Alexei V Filippenko, Thomas G. Brink
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.