Introduction: Early prognostication of neurological outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is extremely important as it can help to reassess therapeutic intensity or select high-risk patients for specific interventions Hypothesis: Age and biological variables obtained from initial simple blood tests could predict poor neurological outcome (PNO) after CPR Methods: Data from all patients admitted after CPR (in and out-of-hospital) from January 2008 to December 2011 in a mixed 35-bed ICU were assessed. Therapeutic hypothermia was used in all patients. We identified those who had a complete blood gas/electrolyte panel within the first hour after ICU admission. PNO was defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 4-5 at hospital discharge. We calculated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for each variable and derived the score from those having the highest AUROCs. We identified the best cut-off point (the best combination of sensitivity and specificity) which was used as a dichotomic value (0 or 1), with 1 representing PNO. We constructed 20 different models with combinations of the variables to identify the best model according to the highest AUROC. All analyses were performed with SPSS 19.0 Results: A total of 127 patients (mean age 61 years, male gender 76%) were included in the analysis; 69% had out-of-hospital CPR and 57% had shockable rhythms. Overall mortality was 58%. Individual AUROCs (CI 95%) used in the model were: Hemoglobin (Hb) 0.65 (0.55-0.74), blood glucose (Gly) 0.63 (0.53-0.73), lactate (Lac) 0.62 (0.52-0.72), total CO2 (TCO2) 0.59 (0.49-0.69), and age 0.62 (0.52-0.71). The model with the best AUROC (0.772 (0.69-0.85)) included Hb < 12.5 g/dl, Gly > 180 mg/dl, Lac > 2 mEq/L, TCO2 < 20 mEq/L and age? 60 years. Scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 resulted in predicted PNOs of 30% (7/23), 51% (30/58) and 91% (42/46), and in predicted good neurological outcomes of 69% (16/23), 48% (28/58) and 8% (4/46), respectively. A score of 4-5 had a sensitivity of 53%, specificity of 92%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 6.38 and negative LR of 0.51 to predict PNO Conclusions: This simple admission score could help to identify early those patients with likely PNO after CPR
V Perez Fontana, Savino Spadaro, Paola Villois, Cláudia Righy Shinotsuka, Alberto Fogagnolo, Leda Nobile, Jean Louis Vincent, Jacques Créteur, Fabio Silvio Taccone
Sean Coeckelenbergh, Leonard Drouard, Brigitte Ickx, Valério Lucidi, Dessy Germanova, Olivier Desebbe, M. Moussa, Salima Naili, Éric Vibert, Didier Samuel, Jacques Duranteau, Jean Louis Vincent, Joseph Rinehart, Philippe Van der Linden, Alexandre Joosten
Kristina E. Rudd, Christopher Seymour, Adam R. Aluisio, Marc E. Augustin, Danstan Bagenda, Abi Beane, Jean Claude Byiringiro, Chung-Chou H. Chang, L. Nathalie Colas, Nicholas Day, A. Pubudu De Silva, Arjen M. Dondorp, Martin W. Dünser, M. Abul Faiz, Donald S. Grant, Rashan Haniffa, Nguyễn Văn Hảo, Jason Kennedy, Adam C. Levine, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Sanjib Mohanty,
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.