28Left atrial voltage predicts AF recurrence after ablation, irrespective of the rhythm during mapping, while circulating biomarkers of fibrosis do not. — Gordon A. Begg (2017) | RDL Network
28Left atrial voltage predicts AF recurrence after ablation, irrespective of the rhythm during mapping, while circulating biomarkers of fibrosis do not.
Article 2017 en
Authors
GB
Gordon A. Begg
RK
Rashid Karim
TO
Tobias Oesterlein
Abstract
2 min read
Background: Circulating biomarkers potentially may be used to improve patient selection for AF ablation. Low voltage areas in the LA are known to predict arrhythmia recurrence when electrophysiological mapping is performed in sinus rhythm (SR). This study tested the predictive capabilities of type III procollagen N terminal peptide (PIIINP), galectin-3 (gal-3), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), and type I collagen C terminal telopeptide (ICTP), and whether low voltage areas in the LA predict AF recurrence irrespective of the rhythm during mapping. Methods: 92 AF ablation patients were studied. 62 patients had paroxysmal AF, 30 had persistent or long-standing persistent AF. Biomarker levels in peripheral and intra-cardiac blood were measured with ELISA. Low voltage (<0.5mV) was expressed as a proportion of the mapped LA surface area after computer 3D reconstruction and analysis of the voltage maps. The pulmonary veins, atrial appendage, and mitral valve anulus were excluded from voltage map analysis. Follow-up was one year. The primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. The secondary endpoint was designed to represent current clinical practice, and was a composite of recurrence despite 2 procedures, or after one procedure if no second procedure was undertaken. a 60-day blanking period was used. Results: The biomarkers were not predictive of either endpoint. After multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, BMI, gender, LA volume/BSA, AF classification, and AF duration, high proportion of low voltage area in the LA was found to predict the primary endpoint in SR-mapping (HR 4.323,, p 0.014) and AF mapping (HR 5.195, p 0.046). This effect was also apparent for the secondary endpoint. Conclusion: The studied biomarkers do not predict arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation. LA voltage is an independent predictor of recurrence, whether the LA is mapped in AF or SR. This may aid decision-making regarding suitability for further procedures in individual ablation patients.
Gordon A. Begg, Rashed Karim, Tobias Oesterlein, Lee Graham, Andrew J. Hogarth, Stephen P Page, Christopher B. Pepper, Kawal Rhode, Professor Gregory Lip, Arun V. Holden, Sven Plein, Muzahir H. Tayebjee
Jelena Kornej, Katja Schumacher, Samira Zeynalova, Philipp Sommer, Arash Arya, Manuela Weiß, Christopher Piorkowski, Daniela Husser, Andreas Bollmann, Professor Gregory Lip, Gerhard Hindricks
Aditya Vaze, Kevin Donahue, Matthew Spring, Mayank Sardana, Kahraman Tanrıverdi, Jane E. Freedman, John F. Keaney, Emelia Benjamin, Steven A. Lubitz, Lawrence Rosenthal, Kevin Floyd, David D. McManus
Michele Tomaselli, Vincenzo Cannone, Denisa Muraru, Giorgio Oliverio, Mara Gavazzoni, Francesca Heilbron, Noela Radu, Francesco Perelli, Davide Stucchi, Cinzia Pece, Virginia Camponetti, Salvatore Rizzo, Giovanni Battista Perego, Sergio Caravita, Claudia Baratto, Gianfranco Parati, Francesco Brasca, Luigi P. Badano
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.