546 publications from this institution
Antithrombotic drugs represent one of the leading pharmacological category used in clinical practice, especially in cardiovascular setting. Their demonstrated antithrombotic efficacy has been fundamental in the improvement of the management of many diseases related to athero-thrombotic or thromboembolic risk in prevention and treatment of cardiovascular events. Nonetheless, they are also associated with a not negligible haemorrhagic risk. Among these risks, intracranial bleeding represents the most feared, and should be kept in mind, prevented when possible and adequately managed when occurs. In this article the intracranial haemorrhagic risk associated to drugs vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants is reviewed.
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the antithrombotic agent of choice for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) for a long time. UFH is also widely used for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, UFH has some limitations such as the need for parenteral administration and close monitoring of its anticoagulant effect. UFH is also associated with bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis.Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are produced by the depolymerization of UFH. LMWHs have pharmacologic advantages over UFH: a better bioavailability after subcutaneous administration, a longer plasma half-life and a more predictable anticoagulant effect. These improved features allow once or twice daily subcutaneous injection of weight-adjusted doses of LMWHs without requiring laboratory monitoring in patients with VTE or unstable angina.A number of new antithrombotic agents are currently under development. These include direct antithrombins and factor Xa inhibitors. The results of the main clinical trials with LMWHs as well as those of the studies with the new antithrombotic agents will be reviewed in this article.
Background The optimal timing to administer non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is unclear. This prospective observational multicenter study evaluated the rates of early recurrence and major bleeding (within 90 days) and their timing in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation who received NOAC s for secondary prevention. Methods and Results Recurrence was defined as the composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and symptomatic systemic embolism, and major bleeding was defined as symptomatic cerebral and major extracranial bleeding. For the analysis, 1127 patients were eligible: 381 (33.8%) were treated with dabigatran, 366 (32.5%) with rivaroxaban, and 380 (33.7%) with apixaban. Patients who received dabigatran were younger and had lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and less commonly had a CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VAS c score >4 and less reduced renal function. Thirty‐two patients (2.8%) had early recurrence, and 27 (2.4%) had major bleeding. The rates of early recurrence and major bleeding were, respectively, 1.8% and 0.5% in patients receiving dabigatran, 1.6% and 2.5% in those receiving rivaroxaban, and 4.0% and 2.9% in those receiving apixaban. Patients who initiated NOAC s within 2 days after acute stroke had a composite rate of recurrence and major bleeding of 12.4%; composite rates were 2.1% for those who initiated NOACs between 3 and 14 days and 9.1% for those who initiated >14 days after acute stroke. Conclusions In patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, treatment with NOAC s was associated with a combined 5% rate of ischemic embolic recurrence and severe bleeding within 90 days.
The role of pharmacological prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in high-risk surgical patients is straightforward during hospitalization but controversial after hospital discharge. Clinical trials based upon venography-detected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), yield high DVT rates which may not be clinically relevant, since most cases are asymptomatic. On the other hand, clinical surveys based upon clinically overt venous thromboembolism yield low DVT rates that underestimate the problem. If postdischarge prophylaxis is used, oral anticoagulants may be more cost-effective than low-molecular-weight heparins. However, optimal strategies for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hospital discharge will not be definitively provided until large studies are performed with sufficient power to detect clinically relevant endpoints such as symptomatic DVT or pulmonary embolism.
In patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), right ventricular dysfunction at echocardiography is associated with increased in-hospital mortality. The aims of this study in patients with acute PE were to identify a sensitive and simple criterion for right ventricular dysfunction at multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) using echocardiography as the reference standard and to evaluate the predictive value of the identified MDCT criterion for in-hospital death or clinical deterioration. Right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT was defined as the right-to-left ventricular dimensional ratio and was centrally assessed by a panel unaware of clinical and echocardiographic data. A right-to-left ventricular dimensional ratio ≥0.9 at MDCT had a 92% sensitivity for right ventricular dysfunction [95% confidence interval (CI) 88–96]. Overall, 457 patients were included in the outcome study: 303 had right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT. In-hospital death or clinical deterioration occurred in 44 patients with and in 8 patients without right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT (14.5 vs. 5.2%; P< 0.004). The negative predictive value of right ventricular dysfunction for death due to PE was 100% (95% CI 98–100). Right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT was an independent predictor for in-hospital death or clinical deterioration in the overall population [hazard ratio (HR) 3.5, 95% CI 1.6–7.7; P= 0.002] and in haemodynamically stable patients (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3–10.9; P= 0.007). In patients with acute PE, MDCT might be used as a single procedure for diagnosis and risk stratification. Patients without right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT have a low risk of in-hospital adverse outcome.
We aimed to describe the event rates and risk-factors for symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in a population of hospitalized acutely ill medical patients.
Choice of End-points in Assessing the Efficacy of Post-discharge Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism -
Background In patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, early anticoagulation prevents ischemic recurrence but with the risk of hemorrhagic transformation ( HT ). The aims of this study were to evaluate in consecutive patients with acute stroke and atrial fibrillation (1) the incidence of early HT, (2) the time to initiation of anticoagulation in patients with HT , (3) the association of HT with ischemic recurrences, and (4) the association of HT with clinical outcome at 90 days. Methods and Results HT was diagnosed by a second brain computed tomographic scan performed 24 to 72 hours after stroke onset. The incidence of ischemic recurrences as well as mortality or disability (modified Rankin Scale scores >2) were evaluated at 90 days. Ischemic recurrences were the composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism. Among the 2183 patients included in the study, 241 (11.0%) had HT . Patients with and without HT initiated anticoagulant therapy after a mean 23.3 and 11.6 days, respectively, from index stroke. At 90 days, 4.6% (95% confidence interval, 2.3–8.0) of the patients with HT had ischemic recurrences compared with 4.9% (95% confidence interval, 4.0–6.0) of those without HT ; 53.1% of patients with HT were deceased or disabled compared with 35.8% of those without HT . On multivariable analysis, HT was associated with mortality or disability (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.24–2.35). Conclusions In patients with HT , anticoagulation was initiated about 12 days later than patients without HT . This delay was not associated with increased detection of ischemic recurrence. HT was associated with increased mortality or disability.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent cause of death and serious disability with a risk extending far beyond the acute phase of the disease. Anticoagulant treatment reduces the risk for death and recurrent VTE after a first PE. The optimal duration of anticoagulation after a first episode of PE remains controversial and should be made on an individual basis, balancing the estimated risk for recurrence without anticoagulant treatment against bleeding risk under anticoagulation. Current recommendations on duration of anticoagulation are based on a 3% per year risk of major bleeding expected during long-term warfarin treatment. Anticoagulant therapy should be discontinued after the initial 3 to 6 months in those patients who had the first episode in association with temporary risk factors. After 3 to 6 months of anticoagulant treatment, patients with a first unprovoked event and an estimated low risk for bleeding complications should be evaluated for indefinite treatment on an individualized basis. None of the clinical prediction models for recurrent VTE are able to actually drive duration of anticoagulation. If the favorable safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants from clinical trials would be confirmed in real-life, extension of anticoagulation could be reconsidered in large proportions of patients after an unprovoked PE. The most feared late sequela of PE is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Although there has been progress in both the diagnosis and management of this disease in recent years, further data are needed to provide recommendations regarding long-term follow-up after PE.