546 publications from this institution
Stroke has a greater effect on women than men owing to the fact that women have more stroke events and are less likely to recover. Age-specific stroke rates are higher in men; however, because of women's longer life expectancy and the much higher incidence of stroke at older ages, women have more stroke events than men overall. The aims of this prospective study in consecutive patients were to assess whether there are gender differences in stroke risk factors, treatment or outcome. Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke were included in this prospective study at four study centers. Disability was assessed using a modified Rankin Scale score (≥3 indicating disabling stroke) in both genders at 90 days. Outcomes and risk factors in both genders were compared using the χ 2 test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify any independent predictors of outcome. A total of 1136 patients were included in this study; of these, 494 (46%) were female. Women were statistically older compared with men: 76.02 (± 12.93) and 72.68 (± 13.27) median years of age, respectively. At admission, females had higher NIH Stroke Scale scores compared with males (9.4 [± 6.94] vs 7.6 [± 6.28] for men; p = 0.0018). Furthermore, females tended to have more cardioembolic strokes (153 [30%] vs 147 [23%] for men; p = 0.004). Males had lacunar and atherosclerotic strokes more often (146 [29%] vs 249 [39%] for men; p = 0.002, and 68 [13%] vs 123 [19%] for men; p = 0.01, respectively). The mean modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months was also significantly different between genders, at 2.5 (± 2.05) for women and 2.1 (± 2.02) for men (p = 0.003). However, at multivariate analysis, female gender was not an indicator for negative outcome. It was concluded that female gender was not an independent factor for negative outcome. In addition, both genders demonstrated different stroke pathophysiologies. These findings should be taken into account when diagnostic workup and treatment are being planned.
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials showed the nonvitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) edoxaban was effective and safe for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE; including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis). Additional research is needed to evaluate the effects of edoxaban in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the Edoxaban Treatment in routine cliNical prActice (ETNA) program is being conducted to provide routine clinical care data on characteristics and outcomes in patients with AF or VTE receiving edoxaban. Methods The Global ETNA program integrates prospectively collected data from edoxaban patients in regional ETNA noninterventional studies across Europe, Japan, and East and Southeast Asia into indication‐specific databases for AF and VTE. Targeted enrollment is >31 000 patients (AF >26 000; VTE >4500), with a follow‐up of 2 years for AF and 1 year for VTE. Data integration will be possible using consistent terminology, parameter definitions, and data collection across the regional noninterventional studies. Safety and effectiveness data will be assessed. Crude rates of outcomes including bleeding and thromboembolic events will be reported. Results Globally, enrollment began in early 2015 and is ongoing. Conclusions Global ETNA will generate the largest integrated prospective repository of routine clinical care data for a single NOAC in patients with AF or VTE. It will provide important information on the safety of edoxaban in routine clinical care and gather further information on its effectiveness.
The current recommended treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) consists of an initial treatment with heparin (either subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin or intravenous unfractionated heparin) relayed with a longterm treatment with oral anticoagulants (INR 2.0 3.0) given for at least three months [1]. The majority of the studies on the long-term treatment of VTE included patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Based on the assumption that DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) are two manifestations of the same disease, information available for patients with DVT are commonly translated to patients with PE. Recently, several differences regarding the risk for recurrent VTE in patients with DVT and PE have been reported. In particular, it has been shown that patients with PE are at slightly higher risk of dying from recurrent PE than are patients with DVT [2-3]. For this reason, more prolonged anticoagulation has been proposed for patients with PE, but this choice is not evidence based. Need for Shortand Long-Term Anticoagulant Treatment
Recent guidelines recommend consideration of the use of oral edoxaban or rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. However, the benefit of these oral agents is limited by the increased risk of bleeding associated with their use.This was a multinational, randomized, investigator-initiated, open-label, noninferiority trial with blinded central outcome adjudication. We randomly assigned consecutive patients with cancer who had symptomatic or incidental acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism to receive oral apixaban (at a dose of 10 mg twice daily for the first 7 days, followed by 5 mg twice daily) or subcutaneous dalteparin (at a dose of 200 IU per kilogram of body weight once daily for the first month, followed by 150 IU per kilogram once daily). The treatments were administered for 6 months. The primary outcome was objectively confirmed recurrent venous thromboembolism during the trial period. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding.Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 32 of 576 patients (5.6%) in the apixaban group and in 46 of 579 patients (7.9%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Major bleeding occurred in 22 patients (3.8%) in the apixaban group and in 23 patients (4.0%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.69; P = 0.60).Oral apixaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism without an increased risk of major bleeding. (Funded by the Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance; Caravaggio ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03045406.).
A high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence requires extended anticoagulation but limits the options to control heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in women of reproductive age. We report the management of HMB in a 48-year-old woman with a history of menometrorrhagia, recurrent VTE and multiple VTE risk factors. Due to the occurrence of HMB during extended rivaroxaban treatment, the presence of a uterine fibroid and the contraindication to interrupt anticoagulation for high risk of VTE recurrence, she received hormonal treatment first with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and then with progestin. This strategy allowed to adequately control HMB, without rivaroxaban discontinuation or dose reduction, and no new thromboembolic and no more bleeding events occurred over a long follow-up period of more than 20 months. In conclusion, the use of hormonal therapy in VTE women requiring long-term anticoagulation may be an option to control HMB, without further increasing the risk of VTE recurrence.
