Publications

Background: Circulating biomarkers potentially may be used to improve patient selection for AF ablation. Low voltage areas in the LA are known to predict arrhythmia recurrence when electrophysiological mapping is performed in sinus rhythm (SR). This study tested the predictive capabilities of type III procollagen N terminal peptide (PIIINP), galectin-3 (gal-3), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), and type I collagen C terminal telopeptide (ICTP), and whether low voltage areas in the LA predict AF recurrence irrespective of the rhythm during mapping. Methods: 92 AF ablation patients were studied. 62 patients had paroxysmal AF, 30 had persistent or long-standing persistent AF. Biomarker levels in peripheral and intra-cardiac blood were measured with ELISA. Low voltage (<0.5mV) was expressed as a proportion of the mapped LA surface area after computer 3D reconstruction and analysis of the voltage maps. The pulmonary veins, atrial appendage, and mitral valve anulus were excluded from voltage map analysis. Follow-up was one year. The primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. The secondary endpoint was designed to represent current clinical practice, and was a composite of recurrence despite 2 procedures, or after one procedure if no second procedure was undertaken. a 60-day blanking period was used. Results: The biomarkers were not predictive of either endpoint. After multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, BMI, gender, LA volume/BSA, AF classification, and AF duration, high proportion of low voltage area in the LA was found to predict the primary endpoint in SR-mapping (HR 4.323,, p 0.014) and AF mapping (HR 5.195, p 0.046). This effect was also apparent for the secondary endpoint. Conclusion: The studied biomarkers do not predict arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation. LA voltage is an independent predictor of recurrence, whether the LA is mapped in AF or SR. This may aid decision-making regarding suitability for further procedures in individual ablation patients.

Our study demonstrated significant differences in the risk of ischaemic stroke, TE/stroke and ICH associated with individual DOACs compared to both other DOACs and VKA.

In this subgroup analysis, dabigatran dual therapy had a lower risk for bleeding and a comparable rate of the efficacy endpoint compared with warfarin triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation with or without diabetes following percutaneous coronary intervention.

This study highlights OBS as a risk stratification tool for CKM, emphasizing oxidative stress's role in CKM staging and mortality risk management.

Covid-19 patients experience an equipollent rate of venous and arterial thrombotic events, that are associated with poor survival. Early identification and appropriate treatment of Covid-19 patients at risk of thrombosis may improve prognosis.

Aim . To analyze clinical characteristics of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Russian population, enrolled in the GLORIA-AF registry phase 2, depending on the antithrombotic therapy received, and to assess the potential for patient retention with dabigatran during a 2-year follow-up. Material and methods . In the Russian Federation, 408 patients were included in the second phase of GLORIA-AF which is a global prospective observational registry of newly diagnosed patients with AF. The patient characteristics are presented depending on received antithrombotic therapy (dabigatran, factor Xa inhibitors, vitamin K antagonist, antiplatelet agents, or no antithrombotic therapy), with a dabigatran dosing regimen of either 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily. Duration of patient retention on dabigatran therapy was also analyzed during a 2-year follow-up. Results . Of the 405 patients with recently diagnosed nonvalvular AF, 358 (88%) received oral anticoagulants (OAC), and 47 (12%) patients received antiplatelet drugs or received no antithrombotic therapy. Most patients were treated with dabigatran (n=275, 68%), and 75 (19%) patients received vitamin K antagonist. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients receiving dabigatran were comparable with those in the general group of the Russian patients. The mean age was 63,5 years. The most common comorbidities in Russian patients receiving dabigatran were hypertension (93%), congestive heart failure (57%), coronary artery disease (35%). It is noteworthy that 12% and 10% of patients had a previous myocardial infarction and stroke, respectively. The mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score for stroke risk for these patients was 3,2; 88% of patients had a high stroke risk (score of &gt;2). Of the 275 patients with AF who received dabigatran therapy, 164 (60%) patients received dabigatran at the dose of 150 mg twice daily, and 111 (40%) patients received 110 mg twice daily. Dabigatran doses of 110 mg twice daily were more frequently prescribed for female patients aged 65 years or older and patients with a previous coronary events and impaired renal function, who had a higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score for stroke risk. There was a higher proportion of AF patients with marked symptoms in the dabigatran 150 mg twice daily group. A median duration of treatment with dabigatran with the initial dosing regimen was 24 months. The estimated dabigatran therapy retention rate was 0,87, 0,81 and 0,73 after 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. Conclusion . In the Russian Federation, patients with newly diagnosed AF who have an increased risk of stroke are more likely to receive OAC therapy, such as direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran), compared to the global cohort of the GLORIA AF Registry Program. Patients in the Russian cohort receiving dabigatran differ from the global cohort of patients by greater comorbidity. At the same time, patients receiving reduced doses of dabigatran, both in the Russian Federation and in the global Registry, are characterized by a greater proportion of patients aged &gt;75 years, a higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, heart failure, impaired renal function, higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score for stroke risk. The potential dabigatran therapy retention rate after 24 months in the Russian Federation and in the global cohort was high and amounted to about 70%.

ISRCTN72104369.

From 2006 to 2015, the number of patients with AF undergoing PCI and the prescription rate of triple therapy increased gradually with a recent increment of NOAC-based antithrombotic therapy from 2013. Previous myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, and PCI were associated with underuse of triple therapy.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are replacing warfarin and heparins in several clinical situations. With varying modes of action, the effects of NOACs on thrombus formation, integrity, and lysis is unknown. To determine whether two techniques of thrombelastography (TEG) and a micro-plate assay (MPA) provide novel data on thrombus formation, integrity and lysis in those taking a NOACs compared to warfarin and a control group taking aspirin. We assessed thrombogenesis, clot integrity and fibrinolysis in blood (TEG) and plasma (MPA) from 182 atrial fibrillation patients-50 on aspirin, 50 on warfarin, and 82 on a NOAC (17 apixaban, 19 dabigatran and 46 rivaroxaban). Eleven of 16 TEG indices and 4 of 5 MPA indices differed (p ≤ 0.01) between those on aspirin, warfarin or a NOAC. Three TEG indices and 4 MPA indices differed (p < 0.01) between the NOACs. Time to initiation of clot formation was most rapid on apixaban, then rivaroxaban and slowest on dabigatran. The rate of clot formation was most rapid on dabigatran, then apixaban, and slowest on rivaroxaban. Clot density was greatest on rivaroxaban, then apixaban, but weakest on dabigatran. The rate of clot dissolution was most rapid in apixaban, then dabigatran, and slowest on rivaroxaban. The TEG and MPA identify major differences in thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis in different NOACs. These techniques may have value in investigating the effects of these drugs on haemostasis in a clinical setting, and in identifying those in need of targeted therapy.

peer reviewed

Due to few randomised participants and typically short-term follow-up, the impact of ExCR on all-cause mortality or serious adverse events for people with AF is uncertain. ExCR likely improves AF-specific measures including reduced AF recurrence, symptom burden, and episode duration, as well as the mental components of HRQoL. ExCR may improve AF symptom severity, episode frequency, and VO_2peak. Future high-quality RCTs are needed to assess the benefits of ExCR for people with AF on patient-relevant outcomes including AF symptom severity and burden, AF recurrence, AF-specific quality of life, and clinical events such as mortality, readmissions, and serious adverse events. High-quality trials are needed to investigate how AF subtype and clinical setting (i.e. primary and secondary care) may influence ExCR effectiveness.