2,697 publications from this institution
OAC overuse was observed in patients with low stroke risk, whilst OAC underuse was evident in those with high risk of stroke. The percentage of highly symptomatic patients with high risk of stroke who were offered a rhythm control strategy was low.
NCT02513316.
The year 2009 was a turning point for thromboprophylaxis for the patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The first randomised control trial (RCT) for a currently licensed non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC), the RE-LY trial comparing the oral direct throkbin inhibitor dabigatran with warfarin, was published.1 This trial led to the global approval of dabigatran as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; eg, warfarin) for the prevention of stroke and thromboembolic events in patients with NVAF. Since the RE-LY trial, three more NOACs (ie, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) supported by their respective RCTs against VKAs, have gained approval and the NOACs are now recommended by international guidelines as the treatment of choice for stroke prevention in NVAF. Due to the availability of additional treatment options and the minor but significant differences in some outcomes between the NOACs, guidelines recommend a more individualised patient approach regarding the selection and dosing of the available drugs.2 In this issue, Lauw et al 3 report a substudy of the RE-LY trial investigating the influence of age on the efficacy and safety outcomes of the original RCTs for the two different doses of dabigatran, that is, 150 mg twice daily and 110 mg twice daily. A reasonable question is what a substudy of an RCT published almost 8 years ago can offer …
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are the most common arrhythmias globally, with far-reaching impacts on quality of life, mortality, and health care costs from stroke, heart failure, and all-cause death, driven by hospitalisations and chronic follow-up.1,2 Previous studies have demonstrated rising global trends in AF prevalence, disability-adjusted life-years (DALY), and deaths, with disparities between different sociodemographic index (SDI) levels; however, some have been limited to specific regions, focused on risk factors, or using dated data.
Stroke prevention with left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an important alternative treatment for high-risk atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (OAC).[1] [2] The presence of LAA thrombus detected on preprocedural imaging usually precludes implantation of the endocardial device because of a prohibitively high periprocedural embolic risk.[3] Although successful resolution of LAA thrombus with OAC has been described, all previous reports are in patients without contraindications to OAC.[4] [5] [6] Furthermore, long-term data in these patients are lacking. We hypothesized that short-term OAC with apixaban could safely facilitate resolution of LAA thrombi even in a high-risk population, thereby allowing safe LAA occluder device implantation, with good outcomes over the long term.