2,697 publications from this institution
Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology ISSN 1470-3947 (print) | ISSN 1479-6848 (online)
Abstract Background Heart Failure (HF) Virtual Wards (HFVW) enable patients with acute HF to be managed in their own homes with digital health technology enabled care by HF specialist teams instead of hospitalization. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves clinical outcomes, however, UK HF audit data indicates that only 5-10% HF patients undergo CR. Purpose We conducted a real-world service improvement evaluation to examine the feasibility and outcomes of a novel digital CR service as a step-down from acute HFVW. Methods Patients on the Acute HFVW received a pre-discharge visit from a specialist HF nurse during which suitable patients were consented for home CR to be started 2 weeks following discharge. Other than standard clinical exclusion criteria for CR, an additional exclusion criterion was lack of access to a smartphone/tablet. Patients received a proprietary, wrist-worn physical activity (PA) monitor to assess minute-level energy expenditure, access to a personalised, interactive online dashboard, and 6x20 minute phone calls across a 12-week period from a trained Mentor to support self-care. Readmissions were assessed at 30-day, 90-day timepoints, and compared to standard care. Further quantitative measures included uptake and adherence, change in objective PA dose, and change in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for Quality of Life (QoL), Mental Wellbeing, Self-Efficacy and Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) domains. Readmission rates were compared using non-parametric statistics (Chi squared test). Results From May 2024, 185 patients (median age 70, range 34-90y, 63% men) were referred to digital home CR from the acute HFVW and 116/185 patients (63%) took up the offer. Programme drop-out rate was 30%. Readmission rates were statistically significantly (p<0.001) lower in the home digital CR service at 30-day, 90-day timepoints in comparison to standard care (5% vs. 21%; and 9% versus 30% respectively). 78% of patients improved their everyday physical activity. On average, patients improved their daily PA dose by +31 minutes per day compared to week-1 blinded baseline, equating to an average additional PA dose of +32 hrs 32 mins per patient across the CR period. Furthermore, 58% of patients improved their QoL, 74% improved their Mental Wellbeing, and 69% improved their Self-Efficacy. With regards to the WSAS domains, 71% of patients improved their ability to work and 86% improved their overall score. Conclusion This is the first study to demonstrate feasibility of home digital CR following step-down from the acute HFVW. Lower readmission rates at 30-day and 90-day timepoints vs. standard care highlight potential for large healthcare cost-savings, which future economic analysis should validate. Uptake rates were six times greater than that for standard HF CR, with increased PA dose and other validated PROMs demonstrating patient impact and the potential benefits of the novel digital CR, following management in a specialist HFVW.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart arrhythmia and is associated with poor outcomes. The adverse effects of AF are mediated through multiple pathways, including endothelial dysfunction, as measured by flow-mediated dilatation. Flow-mediated dilatation has demonstrated endothelial dysfunction in several conditions and is associated with poor outcomes including mortality, yet can be improved with medical therapy. It is thus a useful tool in assessing endothelial function in patients. Endothelial dysfunction is present in patients with AF and is associated with poor outcomes. These patients are generally older and have other co-morbidities such as hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes. The precise process by which AF is affiliated with endothelial damage/dysfunction remains elusive. This review explores the endothelial structure, its physiology and how it is affected in patients with AF. It also assesses the utility of flow mediated dilatation as a technique to assess endothelial function in patients with AF. Key MessagesEndothelial function is affected in patients with atrial fibrillation as with other cardiovascular conditions.Endothelial dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes such as stroke, myocardial infarction and death, yet is a reversible condition.Flow-mediated dilatation is a reliable tool to assess endothelial function in patients with atrial fibrillation.Patients with atrial fibrillation should be considered for endothelial function assessment and attempts made to reverse this condition.
Epidemiology Clinical Features Pathogenesis Investigations Drugs Affecting the Renin-Agiotensin-Aldosterone System & Diuretics Beta blockers and Inotropes Other Vasodilators: Nitrates and Calcium Channel Blockers Antiarrhythmic and Antithrombotic Therapy in Heart Failure Non Pharmacological Therapies for Heart Failure Heart Failure in Primary Care The Future of Heart Failure Management
AIMS: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created significant challenges to healthcare globally, necessitating rapid restructuring of service provision. This questionnaire survey was conducted amongst adult heart failure (HF) patients in the United Kingdom (UK), to understand the impact of COVID-19 upon HF services. METHODS AND RESULTS: The survey was conducted by the Pumping Marvellous Foundation, a UK HF patient charity. 'Survey Monkey' was used to disseminate the questionnaire in the Pumping Marvellous Foundation 's online patient group and in 10 UK hospitals (outpatient hospital and community HF clinics). There were 1050 responses collected (693/1050-66% women); 55% (579/1050) were aged over 60 years. Anxiety level was significantly higher regarding COVID-19 (mean 7 ± 2.5 on anxiety scale of 0 to 10) compared with anxiety regarding HF (6.1 ± 2.4; P < 0.001). Anxiety was higher amongst patients aged ≤60 years about HF (6.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.9 ± 2.5 in those aged >60 years; P = 0.005) and COVID-19 (7.3 ± 2.3 vs. 6.7 ± 2.6 those aged >60 years; P < 0.001). Sixty-five per cent of respondents (686/1050) reported disruption to HF appointments (cancellation or postponement) during the lockdown period. Thirty-seven per cent reported disruption to medication prescription services, and Thirty-four per cent reported inability to access their HF teams promptly. Thirty-two per cent expressed reluctance to attend hospital (25% stated they would only attend hospital if there was no alternative, and 7% stated that they would not attend hospital at all). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant anxiety amongst HF patients regarding COVID-19 and HF. Cancellation or postponement of scheduled clinic appointments, investigations, procedures, prescription, and monitoring services were implicated as sources of anxiety.