Publications

Congestive heart failure is common in real-world patients with AF and is associated with a more complex clinical phenotype, different management, and worse prognosis. Additional interventions are needed to improve prognosis of AF-CHF patients.

There are major challenges ahead for clinicians treating patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The population with AF is expected to expand considerably and yet, apart from anticoagulation, therapies used in AF have not been shown to consistently impact on mortality or reduce adverse cardiovascular events. New approaches to AF management, including the use of novel technologies and structured, integrated care, have the potential to enhance clinical phenotyping or result in better treatment selection and stratified therapy. Here, we report the outcomes of the 6th Consensus Conference of the Atrial Fibrillation Network (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), held at the European Society of Cardiology Heart House in Sophia Antipolis, France, 17-19 January 2017. Sixty-two global specialists in AF and 13 industry partners met to develop innovative solutions based on new approaches to screening and diagnosis, enhancing integration of AF care, developing clinical pathways for treating complex patients, improving stroke prevention strategies, and better patient selection for heart rate and rhythm control. Ultimately, these approaches can lead to better outcomes for patients with AF.

Introduction: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduces stroke and mortality risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF). Patterns of OAC initiation in or after discharge from US em...

In patients with advanced HFREF, a low PP (<40 mm Hg) portends a worse prognosis, whereas a high PP (>50 mm Hg) predicts a relatively favourable prognosis.

The developed PRS scale, combined with clinical covariates, will facilitate the creation of an algorithm to predict long-term mortality. This will enable us to stratify CVD risk more precisely, which may result in earlier implementation of lifestyle changes and dietary adjustments and potentially initiate earlier pharmacotherapy for at-risk individuals.

There is increasing concern regarding impact of clinical complexity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We explored the impact of different clinical complexity features in AF patients. We analyzed patients from a prospective, observational, multicenter Europe-wide AF registry. Features of clinical complexity among patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 were: (1) history of bleeding; (2) frailty; (3) chronic kidney disease (CKD); (4) ≥2 features. A total of 10,169 patients were analyzed. Of these, 141 (1.4%) had history of bleeding, 954 (9.4%) were frail, 1767 (17.4%) had CKD and 1253 (12.3%) had ≥2 features. All features of clinical complexity were less treated with OAC. History of bleeding (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.32-2.85), frailty (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.71), CKD (HR 1.50, 95% 1.28-1.75) and ≥2 features (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.73-2.51) were associated with outcomes. Presence of features of clinical complexity is associated with lower use of OAC and higher risk of outcomes.

Abstract Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Low Dose Azithromycin Prophylaxis (LDAP) is associated with improved outcomes in people suffering frequent exacerbations of COPD, but the widespread use of macrolides in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease has been debated due to safety concerns. Aims and Objectives To investigate the safety and efficacy of LDAP in AF patients with COPD in a large global federated dataset. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study within the global TriNetX Platform, including AF patients with COPD exacerbations. Risks for all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: acute coronary syndrome, thromboembolic events, severe ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding were recorded up to 30 days post-COPD exacerbations and compared between LDAP users (at least 3 months use and using LDAP at index) and an active control group (non-Azithromycin users receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)). Cox regression analyses compared outcomes between groups after propensity-score-matching (PSM) for cardiovascular risk factors. Results We identified 2791 LDAP users with COPD and AF (mean age 71.5±10.6 years, 48.9% female), and 61054 controls. Before PSM, LDAP users showed a lower prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and were less likely to be prescribed oral anticoagulation (68.1% vs 76.1%, p&amp;lt;0.001). After PSM no significant baseline differences were found between two groups. After COPD exacerbation, LDAP users were associated with a lower 30-day risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.60-0.97), MACE (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.57-0.90), ICH (0.48, 95%CI 0.27-0.88) and GI bleeding (HR 0.69,95%CI 0.46-0.89) compared to the conventional treatment with ICS. Analysing the different time frames, the lower risk of thrombotic events was observed during the second week after COPD exacerbation while the magnitude of the bleeding risk reduction was more evident in the first 7 days (Figure 1). Conclusion LDAP use is associated with a lower risk of all-cause death, MACE and bleeding in AF patients with COPD. Further studies are needed to investigate the possible role of LDAP as part of the integrated care management of AF patients with COPD.