The saturated hydrocarbons propane and the butane isomers are both indirect greenhouse gases and key species in liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Leakage of LPG and its component alkanes/alkenes is now thought to explain a significant fraction of the volatile organic burden and oxidative potential in the basin which confines Mexico City. Propane and the butanes, however, are stable enough to escape from the basin. The gas Chromatographie measurements which have drawn attention to their sources within the urban area are used here to estimate rates of ventilation into the free troposphere. The calculations are centered on several well studied February/March pollution episodes. Carbon monoxide observations and emissions data are first exploited to provide a rough time constant for the removal of typical inert pollutant species from the valley. The timescale obtained is validated through an examination of meteorological simulations of three‐dimensional flow. Heuristic arguments and transport modeling establish that propane and the butanes are distributed through the basin in a manner analogous to CO despite differing emissions functions. Ventilation rates and mass loadings yield outbound fluxes in a box model type computation. Estimated in this fashion, escape from the Valley of Mexico constitutes of the order of half of 1% of the northern hemispheric inputs for both propane and n‐butane. Uncertainties in the calculations are detailed and include factors such as flow into the basin via surface winds and the size of the polluted regime. General quantification of the global propane and butane emissions from large cities will entail studies of this type in a variety of locales.
Abstract Background Farmers and farmworkers are particularly vulnerable to the mental health impacts of environmental stressors such as flooding and drought. While studies from countries like Australia have explored this, there is a critical gap in understanding these effects in farming communities elsewhere, including England-especially as such events increase with climate change. This study investigates how flooding and drought affect the mental health and wellbeing of farmers and farmworkers in England, examining impacts on livelihoods and exploring both risk and protective factors. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used, beginning with a national online survey distributed through agricultural organisations in early 2025. Mental wellbeing was assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). Thematic analysis was applied to survey responses to identify key patterns in mental health challenges, coping strategies, and resilience. A subset of respondents will be invited for follow-up semi-structured interviews to gather deeper qualitative insights. Results The survey received 94 complete responses, representing every region of England and a variety of farm types. Results reveal a high prevalence of mental health issues among respondents, with limited professional help-seeking. Support from family and friends emerged as central to coping, alongside specific personal strategies. The national government was often cited as having a role in supporting mental health in relation to climate-related impacts. Conclusions This study underscores the importance of considering local and national contexts when addressing the mental health impacts of flooding and drought on farming communities. Findings will inform targeted health protection interventions and contribute to international research on the mental health effects of climate change.
Methane (CH4) and carbon monoxide (CO) mixing ratios were measured at an air quality monitoring station near the Mt. Wilson (MW) Observatory in southern California starting in the spring of 2007. Diurnal variation and mixing ratio correlation (R2 = 0.81) were observed. The correlation results observed agree with previous aircraft measurements collected over the greater Los Angeles (LA) metropolitan area. The consistent agreement between CH4 and CO indicates these gases are well-mixed before reaching the sampling site and the emission source contributions of both compounds are reasonably constant. Since CH4 and CO are considered non-reactive on the time scale of dispersion within the LA urban area and their emission sources are likely to be similarly distributed (e.g., associated with human activities) they are subject to similar scales of atmospheric transport and dilution. This behavior allows the relationship of CH4 and CO to be applied for estimation of CH4 emissions using well-documented CO emissions. Applying this relationship a "top-down" CH4 inventory was calculated for LA County based on the measurements observed at MW and compared with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) "bottom-up" CH4 emissions inventory based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommended methodologies. The "top-down" CH4 emissions inventory is approximately one-third greater than CARB's "bottom-up" inventory for LA County. Considering the uncertainties in both methodologies, the different CH4 emissions inventory approaches are in good agreement, although some under and/or uninventoried CH4 sources may exist.