We have identified an optical binary with orbital period P_b=4488s as the\nprobable counterpart of the Fermi source 2FGL J1653.6-0159. Although pulsations\nhave not yet been detected, the source properties are consistent with an\nevaporating millisecond pulsar binary; this P_b=75min is the record low for a\nspin-powered system. The heated side of the companion shows coherent radial\nvelocity variations, with amplitude K=666.9+/-7.5 km/s for a large mass\nfunction of f(M)=1.60+/-0.05 M_sun. This heating suggests a pulsar luminosity\n~3x10^34 erg/s. The colors and spectra show additional hard emission dominating\nat binary minimum. Its origin is, at present, unclear. This system is similar\nto PSR J1311-3430, with a low mass H-depleted companion, a dense shrouding wind\nand, likely, a large pulsar mass.\n
Reactions of [(dippe)PtMe(Et2O)][BArf4] (4[BArf4], dippe = 1,2-bis(diisopropylphosphino)ethane; Arf = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3) with Mes2EH2 (Mes = mesityl) liberate methane and produce silylene, germylene, or stannylene products [(dippe)Pt(H)═EMes2][BArf4] (E = Si, 1[BArf4]; Ge, 8; Sn, 9). In contrast, treatment of 4[BArf4] with tertiary silanes HSiR3 (R = Ph, Et, OEt) failed to give the expected cationic silyl complexes but instead produced the bridging hydride [(dippe)Pt(μ-H)]2[BArf4]2 (10) along with the corresponding disilane Si2R6. Complex 10 reacts with primary stibines RSbH2 (R = Mes, dmp) to afford dimeric stibido complexes [(dippe)Pt(μ-SbHR)]2[BArf4]2 (R = Mes, 11; dmp, 12) via Sb–H bond activation.
In writing Bourdieu in the City, the author did not plan to propose an eclectic combination of the structuralist and the phenomenological takes on the city rehearsing Bourdieu's influential critique of the deadly antinomy of objectivism and subjectivism. By social space, the Bourdieu of Distinction means the multidimensional distribution of agents in objective positions defined by the allocation of efficient resources or capital, economic, cultural, social, and symbolic, for the generic species (which can be further specified depending on the field or subfield, e.g., bureaucratic versus intellectual capital in the academic field). For purposes of theoretical parsimony, these multiple dimensions can be collapsed into the two axes of total volume of capital (in its different pertinent forms) and composition of capital (especially the relative weight of economic and cultural capital), with a third axis capturing changes over time in capital volume and composition.