1,987 publications from this institution
Autism is a pervasive developmental disorder characterized by profound social and verbal communication deficits, stereotypical motor behaviors, restricted interests, and cognitive abnormalities. Autism affects approximately 1% of children in developing countries. Given this prevalence, identifying risk factors and therapeutic interventions are pressing objectives—objectives that rest on neurobiologically grounded and psychologically informed theories about the underlying pathophysiology. In this article, we review the evidence that autism could result from a dysfunctional oxytocin system early in life. As a mediator of successful procreation, not only in the reproductive system, but also in the brain, oxytocin plays a crucial role in sculpting socio-sexual behavior. Formulated within a (Bayesian) predictive coding framework, we propose that oxytocin encodes the saliency or precision of interoceptive signals and enables the neuronal plasticity necessary for acquiring a generative model of the emotional and social 'self.' An aberrant oxytocin system in infancy could therefore help explain the marked deficits in language and social communication – as well as the sensory, autonomic, motor, behavioral, and cognitive abnormalities – seen in autism.
Mathematical models of scientific data can be formally compared using Bayesian model evidence. Previous applications in the biological sciences have mainly focussed on model selection in which one first selects the model with the highest evidence and then makes inferences based on the parameters of that model. This "best model" approach is very useful but can become brittle if there are a large number of models to compare, and if different subjects use different models. To overcome this shortcoming we propose the combination of two further approaches: (i) family level inference and (ii) Bayesian model averaging within families. Family level inference removes uncertainty about aspects of model structure other than the characteristic of interest. For example: What are the inputs to the system? Is processing serial or parallel? Is it linear or nonlinear? Is it mediated by a single, crucial connection? We apply Bayesian model averaging within families to provide inferences about parameters that are independent of further assumptions about model structure. We illustrate the methods using Dynamic Causal Models of brain imaging data.
This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR) measurements, CS and US information, keypress responses, keypress response times, key correctness and shock ratings for each of 20 healthy unmedicated participants (10 males and 10 females aged 22.2+/-4.0 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. CS is a visual stimulus appearing in the middle of the screen with variation in color. US is an electric shock as a 500 Hz current pulses train (individual pulse width: 0.5ms, varying current amplitudes (0.90+/-0.63 mA) train width:500 ms). SOA between the CS and US is 3.5 s. The ITI is randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11 s. (This was correctly stated in Staib et al. (2015) but wrongly described in Bach et al. (2010).)