2,833 publications from this institution
INTRODUCTION. Infection is frequent in patients treated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and yet pharmacokinetics (PKs) of beta-lactams during ECMO have not been well studied. In critically ill patients, antimicrobial PKs are significantly altered and may result in subtherapeutic drug concentrations [1,2]. ECMO introduces additional confounding factors, which may further alter antibiotic concentrations.OBJECTIVES. We hypothezised that meropenem (MERO) and piperacillin (PIP) PKs parameters are altered in critically ill patients treated with ECMO.METHODS. We reviewed all patients in whom drug levels were measured during MERO or PIP therapy while on ECMO support (from January 2010 to December 2012). Drug concentrations were measured after 2 hours from the onset of a 30-min perfusion and just before (trough, C0) the next dose; PKs were estimated using a one-compartment model. Using a database of all patients having b-lactams level measurements, ECMO patients were matched with non-ECMO patients according to: 1) drug regimen; 2) renal function (i.e. similar measured creatinine clearance or similar intensity of therapy if on continuous renal replacement therapy); 3) total body weight; 4) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on the day of drug levels measurement. Drug concentrations were considered as adequate if drug levels remained between 4 and 8 times the clinical breakpoint of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during 50% (PIP) or 40% (MERO) of the dose interval.RESULTS. A total of 41 drug levels (MERO=27; PIP = 14) were obtained in 26 patients treated with ECMO (16 veno-venous and 9 veno-arterial) and 41 matched controls. Patients' characteristics are shown in the table. ECMO patients had higher ICU mortality (58% vs. 26%), longer ICU stay and greater need of mechanical ventilation (93% vs. 66%), but similar need for vasopressors (66% vs. 63%) No significant differences were found between ECMO and non-ECMO patients in serum concentrations and in PKs variables: volume of distribution (0.38 [0.27-0.68] vs. 0.46 [0.33-0.79] L/Kg, p=0.37), half-life time (2.6 [1.8-4.4] vs. 2.9 [1.7-3.7] hours, p=0.96) and total clearance (132 [66-200] vs 141 [93-197] ml/min, p=0.52). This was also true when either MERO or PIP PKs were considered separately. The proportion of insufficient (13/41 vs. 12/41), adequate (15/41 vs. 19/41) and excessive (13/41 vs. 10/41) drug levels was similar in ECMO and control group, respectively.CONCLUSIONS. MERO and PIP drug concentrations and their PKs are not altered by ECMO in critically ill patients.REFERENCE(S).1. Roberts DM, Crit Care 20122. Udy AA, Chest 2012
Dobutamine administration has been shown to increase oxygen delivery in various conditions, but there are little data to document its effects in septic shock. We investigated the effects of dobutamine infusion at a rate of 5 micrograms/kg.min in 18 patients (mean 60 +/- 16 yr) with septic shock initially characterized by hypotension, oliguria, and hyperlactatemia in the presence of a documented source of sepsis. Early resuscitation had consisted of fluid administration and vasopressors when required. When added to this standard regimen, dobutamine had no significant effect on mean arterial pressure (MAP) (from 71 +/- 12 to 73 +/- 13 mm Hg), but markedly increased cardiac index (from 3.0 +/- 0.7 to 3.9 +/- 1.0 L/min.m2, p less than .001), stroke index (from 32 +/- 8 to 37 +/- 9 ml/m2, p less than .001) and oxygen transport (from 410 +/- 105 to 530 +/- 146 ml/min.m2, p less than .001). Oxygen consumption (VO2) increased concurrently (from 137 +/- 42 to 162 +/- 66 ml/min.m2, p less than .002). MAP increased (from 68 +/- 9 to 76 +/- 11 mm Hg) in 12 patients and decreased moderately (from 76 +/- 18 to 69 +/- 17 mm Hg) in six patients. The two subgroups of patients had similar hemodynamic profiles before the dobutamine infusion, but vasopressor therapy was already used in one of the 12 patients in the first subgroup and in three of the six patients in the second subgroup (p less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
info:eu-repo/semantics/published
Circulatory shock is common and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Appropriate shock treatment relies on a good understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying shock. In this article, we provide an update on the description, classification, and management of shock states built on foundations laid by Dr Max Harry Weil, a key early contributor to this field.
Acute renal failure often has a complex origin, especially in critically ill patient. Moreover, the tools for investigation of renal failure are generally unspecific, so that the work-up must be based on several elements. It is particularly important to differentiate failure of the kidney itself from prerenal or postrenal failure, since the therapeutic implications are very different. We propose to base the investigation of acute renal failure on some elements to be evaluated in a rapid succession. The complete evaluation should also take into account the consequences of renal failure, which also have therapeutic implications.