Cancer has been a growing public health problem throughout the last century. Cancer mortality rates in both sexes combined in the European Union (EU) reached a peak in 1988. Thereafter, they declined by 9.4% in 1998. Likewise, lung cancer rates in the EU for both sexes combined increased by 58% between 1960 and 1988, but declined by 14% in 1998. Over a third of the decline was accounted for by lung cancer alone and approximately half by the combination of tobacco-related neoplasms. About half of the decline in total cancer mortality not attributable to tobacco derived from the steady fall in mortality from gastric cancer. The remaining half, including favourable trends in colorectal, breast, testis and lymphoid neoplasms, can be at least in part attributed to advancements in cancer diagnosis and treatment. The major causes of cancer and hence the most important priorities for research will be reviewed, with a specific focus on European priorities for research.
These findings suggest that exogenous oestrogens do not increase the risk of cervical cancer and may decrease the risk.
Incidence registration and survival data from brain neoplasms have been analyzed from the population-based system of the Cancer Registry of the Swiss Canton of Vaud, which has been operating in a particularly favorable environment for surveillance and using an integrated and homogeneous system of cancer registration. Between 1974 and 1987, a total of 401 cases was registered, corresponding to an age-adjusted rate for all malignant histotypes of 5.3/100,000 (world standard) for the period 1975-1980 and 5.0 for 1981-1987 in males, and of 3.9 and 3.7, respectively, in females. Thus, no increase in brain neoplasm incidence has taken place in this population, and indeed some decline has been observed in males, particularly for gliomas (from 2.7 to 2.0). During the most recent calendar period, incidence rates were 2.0 in males and 1.5 in females for gliomas, 0.9 in both sexes for astrocytomas, 0.4 in males and 0.1 in females for oligodendrogliomas, and 1.7 in males and 1.2 in females for other or unspecified histotypes. For both gliomas, astrocytomas and total brain neoplasms, the peak rate was observed in the age group 55-74, and some flattening of rates was registered above age 75. Overall 5-year survival was 16%. While there was no difference between sexes, survival rates were substantially lower at older (greater than or equal to 60 years, 3%) than at younger (less than 60 years, 26%) age, and for gliomas (7% at 5 years) than for other histological types. However, the histotype distribution could not explain the major difference in survival by age, since similar differences were observed for various histotypes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This meta-analysis provides reassuring evidence on the absence of any major risk of adverse pregnancy outcome as a result of exposure to a VDT. With the number of cases reviewed, it was possible to exclude excess risk of 20% for spontaneous abortion, low birth weight, and congenital malformations.
The relation between family history of ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer and risk of epithelial ovarian carcinoma was analyzed within the framework of a case-control study conducted from 1983 to 1989. The study included 755 cases of ovarian cancer and 2,023 controls in hospital for a spectrum of acute nongynecologic, hormonal, or neoplastic conditions in the Greater Milan area, Italy. Eighteen cases (2%) and 24 controls (1%) reported a history of ovarian cancer in a first-degree relative: The corresponding multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.6). The risk of ovarian cancer was elevated in women reporting a family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3), but no significant association emerged with a family history of endometrial cancer (OR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-1.7). When the data were stratified by family history of breast cancer, a family history of ovarian cancer was over 10 times more frequent in both cases and controls who reported a family history of breast cancer than in cases and controls reporting no family history of breast cancer. The estimated odds ratio for ovarian cancer associated with a family history of the disease was 2.3 (95% CI 1.1-4.5) in women not reporting a family history of breast cancer, but no association emerged in the subgroup of women reporting a family history of breast cancer. These results confirm that a family history of ovarian cancer increases the risk of the disease, but the percentage of ovarian cancer cases explained by a family history of the disease is small: Less than 1% of observed cases in this study could be attributed to this "family risk factor."