2,971 publications from this institution
<p>Supplementary Table 4: Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between intake of proton-pump inhibitors and gastric cancer from the leave-one-out meta-analysis.</p>
A comparison of risk estimates using controls with other cancers versus controls with acute diseases unrelated to tobacco and alcohol consumption in the study of the effect of these two factors has been performed using data on tumours of the oral cavity and pharynx from an ongoing case-control surveillance programme in Northeastern Italy. Similar results were obtained using either type of controls: as compared to never smokers, moderate smokers (less than or equal to 14 cigarettes/day) showed age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 5.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9-9.2) when using cancer controls and 5.8 (95% CI: 3.3-10.1) when using non-cancer controls. Similarly, those who had smoked for 40 years or longer showed ORs of 7.4 (95% CI: 4.0-13.6) and 8.8 (95% CI: 4.9-15.6), respectively, using cancer and non-cancer controls. For moderate drinkers of alcoholic beverages (21-34 drinks/week) and heavy drinkers (greater than or equal to 84 drinks/week) the ORs, as compared to individuals who drank less than 21 drinks/week, were 1.9 (95% CI: 1.0-3.6) and 2.2 (95% CI: 1.2-4.0) and 10.6 (95% CI: 5.5-20.6) and 11.4 (95% CI: 6.0-21.4) using cancer and non-cancer controls, respectively. The same comparability of ORs for tobacco- and alcohol-related variables using either type of controls was observed when separate analyses of the two sexes were performed. The close similarity between cancer and non-cancer controls in studies on tobacco- and alcohol-related risks may be exploited when the choice of other types of controls would increase the costs and the feasibility of the study, and thus hamper its statistical power.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
All ages and truncated (35 to 64 years) mortality rates from all neoplasms and from cancers of the lung, stomach, intestines, and breast for the six calendar quinquennia from 1960-1964 to 1985-1989 were computed from official death certification data and population estimates obtained from the World Health Organization database for total Europe (excluding former Soviet Union) and for three broad European areas: (a) member countries of the European Economic Community for the last period of the study; (b) other Western European countries; and (c) Eastern European countries. In Europe, mortality rates for all neoplasms increased for men and decreased for women. The increase in men can be largely explained by the major tobacco-related lung cancer epidemic throughout Europe. Lung cancer mortality rates rose steeply in Eastern Europe, where the truncated rates reached the highest levels ever observed, and there is no evidence of a leveling off. Stomach cancer mortality decreased in all Europe for both sexes, although rates remained higher in Eastern Europe, while intestinal cancer rates tended to level off around the highest values in various areas of the continent. Breast cancer showed a moderate but steady increase. Overall, the most unfavorable trends were in Eastern Europe, due to major epidemics in tobacco-related neoplasms and in other common cancers related to diet and other lifestyle habits.
Inspection of the age-incidence curve of ischaemic heart disease in both sexes shows an increase in slope for women around the menopause, approaching that of men at older ages. Although the increase is likely to be related to the menopause, epidemiological evidence is not defined. Likewise, there is some suggestion that reproductive factors may be related to the subsequent risk of cardiovascular diseases, since a few studies found an elevated risk in women with an earlier first birth. In terms of prevention and public health considerations, treatments via exogenous hormones are, however, much more important. A systematic overview of the available epidemiological evidence indicates that oestrogen replacement treatment is protective against ischaemic heart disease. The overall relative risks based on 18 studies and greater than 3300 cases was 0.81, with a narrow 95% confidence interval (0.76-0.85), thus suggesting a protective effect of 15-25%. This protection has a plausible biological interpretation in terms of increased high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. The serum lipoprotein pattern can be unfavourably influenced by progestin supplementation. With reference to oral contraceptives, the relative risk for cardiovascular mortality was increased about twofold in current users. There appears now to be convincing evidence that the elevated risk is restricted to current users.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)