2,971 publications from this institution
This comprehensive study provides compelling evidence that the consumption of fruits overall, citrus fruits, pome fruits and tropical fruits reduce the BC risk. Besides, evidence was found for an inverse association between total vegetables and shoot vegetables intake.
To better understand the nutritional etiology of squamous cell esophageal cancer, we conducted a case-control study in 3 areas of northern Italy. A total of 304 incident, histologically confirmed cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (275 men, 29 women) and 743 hospital controls (593 men, 150 women) with acute, non-neoplastic conditions, not related to smoking, alcohol consumption or long-term diet modification, were interviewed during 1992 to 1997. The validated food-frequency questionnaire included 78 questions on food items or recipes, which were then categorized into 19 main food groups, and 10 questions on fat intake pattern. After allowance for age, sex, education, area of residence, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking and non-alcohol energy, a significant increased risk emerged for high consumption of soups (OR=2.1 for the highest vs. lowest quintile), whereas inverse associations with esophageal cancer risk were observed for pasta and rice (OR=0.7), poultry (OR=0.4), raw vegetables (OR=0.3), citrus fruit (OR=0.4) and other fruit (OR=0.5). The associations with dietary habits were consistent in different strata of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking. Among added lipids, olive oil intake showed a significant reduction of esophageal cancer risk, even after allowance for total vegetable consumption (OR=0.4), while butter consumption was directly associated with this risk (OR=2.2). Our results thus provide further support to the evidence that raw vegetables and citrus fruit are inversely related to the risk of squamous cell esophageal cancer and suggest that olive oil may also reduce this risk. Int. J. Cancer 87:289–294, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Exposure to a few selected and potentially modifiable risk indicators explained about one third of the cases of breast cancer in this Italian population, indicating the theoretical scope for prevention of the disease.
The report of an increase of ovarian cancer risk among women who had used fertility drugs prompted us to analyse the relationship between fertility drugs and ovarian cancer in a case-control study which has been ongoing in four areas of Italy since 1992. The present analysis is based on 195 epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1339 controls admitted to hospital for diseases other than gynaecological or malignant conditions. Fewer ovarian cancer cases than controls reported use of fertility drugs (odds ratio, after allowance for potential confounding factors: 0.7, 95% confidence interval: 0.2-3.3). Among nulligravid women, 5/177 control women compared with 0/36 cancer cases reported having ever used fertility drugs. Although only based on small numbers of women who were suffering from ovarian cancer and who had also used fertility drugs, the present study indicated that a role of ovarian stimulation in the aetiology of epithelial ovarian cancer is not established, although it is worth investigating.