Este resumen de políticas (D4.1) se crea en el marco del proyecto PLAN-B de Horizon Europe (acuerdo de subvención Nº 101135308), en colaboración con su proyecto hermano AquaPLAN (acuerdo de subvención Nº 101135471). Este resumen proporciona directrices estratégicas para que la Unión Europea avance en el abordaje de la contaminación lumínica, reconociendo sus impactos ambientales adversos, coordinando esfuerzos y ofreciendo un marco para la acción nacional conjunta, así como promoviendo la regulación y gestión de la iluminación artificial nocturna (ALAN, del inglés Artificial Light at Night) basada en evidencia científica. Para apoyar las medidas políticas encaminadas a reducir la contaminación lumínica, se alienta a las personas a firmar un formulario de apoyo, mientras que las organizaciones pueden apoyar la iniciativa firmando una carta de apoyo, que está disponible a solicitud a los contactos que figuran en el documento informativo sobre políticas. Cita recomendada Yakushina, Y., Klenke, R., Fletcher, D., Jones, L., Nascimento, A. T. A., Teixeira, C. P., Goulart, V. D. L. R, Maggi, E., Hoelker, F., Barnett, C., Tysiac, P., Sanchez de Miguel, A., Sheriff, G., Lomas, M. J., Van Hoorick, G., & Wood, M.D. (2025). Restoring the night: A policy agenda for light pollution mitigation in Europe. Policy brief written by the PLAN-B project (Horizon Europe No. 101135308) and the AquaPLAN project (Horizon Europe No. 101135471). Traducido al español por Florencia Reichmann & Daniel Lisbona. Zenodo. Disclaimer This publication was produced under the Horizon Europe programme (Grant Agreement No. 101135308) as part of the PLAN-B project. The content reflects only the views of the authors. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein. The information is provided “as is” without warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The PLAN-B Consortium accepts no liability for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages arising from its use. This is a Spanish translation of the Policy Brief “Restoring the Night: A Policy Agenda for Light Pollution Mitigation in Europe” (published June 2025) (access the original version here).
Abstract Cultural ecosystem services (CES), a key aspect of nature's contributions to people, remain a challenge to incorporate into decision making. One contributing factor is the difficulty of defining and describing these, due partly to: ongoing poor understanding of what drives people to interact with nature, a lack of appropriate data to quantify these interactions, and basic difficulties in measuring and modelling the complex array of social, psychological and behavioural attributes which help explain people's actions. In this study we present a framework which develops the concepts of cultural capital, social capital and human capital as specific forms of human‐centred capital, in the context of their contribution to understanding CES. Each form of capital encompasses separate attributes of beneficiaries. Testing the framework with data from a separate trans‐disciplinary study illustrated that the framework was readily applicable to specific situations. A measure of cultural capital, EcoCentrism, explained more variation than a suite of seven demographic variables. Applying the framework also showed that despite using a wide range of explanatory variables, a large proportion of observed variation remained unaccounted for. This suggests that more work is needed to understand and to develop metrics which can measure additional factors which underlie peoples’ motivations to engage with nature. The framework is applicable to other types of ecosystem service, and may also be useful for exploring relational values. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
ABSTRACT Questions How did α‐, β‐ and γ‐ plant diversity of coastal dune slack plant communities change over 37 years during a period of significant changes in conservation management practices? Location Ainsdale Sand Dunes National Nature Reserve, England. Methods We surveyed plant communities in dune slacks at Ainsdale Sand Dunes National Nature Reserve at two time points: in 1985 and in 2022. This period represents a time of significant change involving the introduction of conservation grazing in the context of declining natural rabbit populations and a changing environment. Results We show that over 37 years, α‐diversity remained relatively stable, but γ‐diversity increased, and β‐diversity indicated shifts in community structure. Specifically, across the open dunes we observed a decline in positive dune slack indicator species (i.e., of conservation interest), an increase in Salix repens (frequency, cover and height) and a shift towards shade‐tolerant and nitrogen‐loving plants (as evidenced by Ellenberg values). Conclusions These findings suggest that despite the introduction of a conservation grazing programme, current grazing patterns (both wild and livestock) may not provide the level of disturbance required to maintain the open habitats and plant communities typical of healthy dune slacks.