286 publications from this institution
Rapid and unplanned urbanisation can lead to altered local climate by increasing land surface temperature (LST), particularly in summer months. This study investigates the Urban Heat Island (UHI) in Greater Cairo, Egypt, using remote sensing techniques to estimate LST of summer months over 45 years (1986, 2000, 2017, and predicted year 2030). The methodological steps were, 1- mapped land use/ land cover (LULC), 2- conducted spatiotemporal analysis of LST, with a comparison of change in LST across different land cover types, 3- predicted future LST for 2030, and 4- examined this temporal change for a hot-spot area (Greater Cairo ring road) and a cool-spot area (the River Nile). The results showed a notable rise of LST in the Cairo ring road buffer zone (88 km2), where it was 31.1oC (1986), 33.4 oC (2000) and 37 oC (2017), due to the triple increase of urban areas on account of agriculture areas, and LST may reach 38.9 oC by 2030. The mean LST increased slightly more in urban hot-spot areas than in cooler cultivated areas. The UHI may induce a modification in local climate that can negatively affect agricultural land, and human thermal comfort and unfortunately lead to a less sustainable environment.
Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser Add Paper to My Library Share: Permalink Using these links will ensure access to this page indefinitely Copy URL Copy DOI
Short Description:<br/>Experiential learning is important for people’s knowledge of and engagement with the natural world. Greater engagement in turn brings multiple benefits to wellbeing and physical health, and is particularly important as young people’s engagement with nature is rapidly declining.<br/><br/>Urban nature-based-solutions (NBS) provide considerable opportunities for enhancing people’s experiences of natural processes, since more than half of the world’s population live in cities, and urban nature may be the only way for many people to experience nature. At the same time, new techniques for mapping, modelling and visualising our urban NBS and the benefits they provide, are exceedingly useful heuristic tools for enhancing learning and engagement. <br/><br/>This brings multiple opportunities: <br/>- innovative tools for visualizing NBS in ways that enhance people’s understanding of long-term ecological processes and make the less visible benefits from greenspace (improved mental health, relaxation, pollution removal, carbon sequestration etc.) more immediately tangible.<br/>-new ways of presenting urban nature and NBS to young people and the public to stimulate interest and activities.<br/>-new opportunities for exploring the educational potential of NBS and how we can improve existing NBS or create new NBS to bring more options for creative learning and playful interaction among people within urban ecosystems.<br/><br/>This session builds on ideas developed in the EU H2020 REGREEN project (www.regreen-project.eu/). We welcome presentations on creative ways of enhancing learning and engagement with urban nature, for example making use of mapping, modelling or other visualisation tools, and new ways of thinking about engagement with nature. <br/>
Groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems (GWDTEs) face multiple pressures from both atmospheric and terrestrial sources, resulting in the loss of protected habitats and biodiversity. One of the most critical issues facing GWDTEs in England and Wales is anthropogenic pollution from nutrients. Anthropogenic nutrients can originate from a wide range of sources including industry and agriculture, and can be transmitted via multiple pathways including; surface waters, catchment runoff, groundwater, and atmospheric deposition. These multiple pathways pose a problem for environmental regulators and managers. In order to reduce nutrient damage to wetlands, environmental regulators must first have the tools to identify the dominant sources and pathways (source attribution) of nutrients. Environmental regulators need cost effective tools to identify the most common source of nutrients in order to implement effective measures to reduce pressures. However there are a lack of source apportionment studies for GWDTEs, and no framework by which to assess multiple sources of nitrogen. This report aims to bridge that gap by considering both atmospheric and terrestrial sources of nitrogen in one study. Three GWDTEs were studied all characterised during previous Water Framework Directive investigations; Wybunbury Moss, Newbald Becksies and Cors Bodeilio. Each site benefited from existing monitoring data and an evidenced based conceptual model, significantly reducing costs to this project. Field data collection included; inorganic chemistry of groundwater, surface water and rainfall, nitrogen and oxygen isotopes and CFC /SF6 and NH3 /NO2 diffusion tubes deployed to quantify atmospheric dry gaseous deposition. Desk based analysis included; modeled atmospheric source apportionment from www.APIS.ac.uk, catchment nutrient modelling using the ‘Farmscoper’ tool and calculation and comparison of nutrient fluxes against site relevant critical loads from both modeled and measured atmospheric deposition data. We found that; Modelled atmospheric deposition data (www.APIS.ac.uk) was broadly comparable to our monthly on-site data collected at the three GWDTEs, but individual sites showed differing variability in ammonia concentrations compared with the national data. Modeled data provides a reliable way to quickly assess atmospheric loading at GWDTEs for national scale assessments, however site specific assessments should undertake their own measurements of ammonia concentrations. Detailed on site assessments of the pressure from atmospheric deposition to individual habitats are possible using National Vegetation Classification (NVC) mapping combined with Critical Load thresholds and modelled atmospheric deposition. Together these can provide a high resolution picture at site scale, provided vegetation mapping is available Open access modelling tool FarmScoper (ADAS) was successfully applied, however in both examples the modelling shows that even with land use changes the reduction in terrestrial nitrate would not be significant enough to meet the proposed groundwater ‘threshold’ values for nitrate.