The central Red Sea is a nascent oceanic basin. Miocene evaporites, kilometers in thickness, were deposited during its continental rifting phase and early seafloor spreading. With further seafloor spreading, increasing dissolution due to increasing hydrothermal...
This study presents a new in situ method to explore the impact of macrofauna on seafloor microtopography and corresponding microroughness based on underwat
The bathymetric data were collected on the 27<sup>th</sup> of June 2020 as underway research data on a 1.5 km track during the cruise EMB239 with the German research vessel Elisabeth Mann Borgese. The objective of the data acquisition was to survey seafloor scars resulting from the controlled detonation of ground mines. For data acquisition, the ship’s hull-mounted Sonic 2024 (R2Sonic Inc.) multibeam echosounder was used. The raw sonar data were loaded in Qimera v2.4.3 (Quality Positioning Services B.V.) and automatically processed to compute sounding footprint location under consideration of sound velocity, position, motion, and heading information. To make the data usable without any specific software, the georeferenced soundings were exported without any bathymetric data cleaning as comma-separated ASCII file in the coordinate reference system EPSG: 32632 - WGS84 / UTM zone 32N. For more details please refer to Papenmeier, S., Darr, A., Feldens, P. (in prep): Geomorphological data from detonation craters in the Fehmarnbelt, German Baltic Sea.
Military munitions from World War I and II dumped at the seafloor are a threat to the marine environment and its users. Decades of saltwater exposure make the explosives fragile and difficult to dispose of. If required, the munition is blast-in-place. In August 2019, 42 ground mines were detonated in a controlled manner underwater during a NATO maneuver in the German Natura2000 Special Area of Conservation Fehmarn Belt, the Baltic Sea. In June 2020, four detonation craters were investigated with a multibeam echosounder for the first time. This dataset is represented here as maps of bathymetry, slope angle, and height difference to the surrounding. The circular craters were still clearly visible a year after the detonation. The diameter and depth of the structures were between 7.5–12.6 m and 0.7–2.2 m, respectively. In total, about 321 m2 of the seafloor was destroyed along the track line.
No abstract is provided for this article.
The raw data used for the study Seasonal Change of Multifrequency Backscatter in three Baltic Sea Habitats by Schulze et al.; currently under review at Frontiers in Remote Sensing. Files are stored in the s7k-Format, and sorted by date of acquisition and frequency. 200 and 400 kHz data were manufacturer-calibrated. Correct absorption values have been applied duirng the export. Refer to the paper for further dataset information. This upload stores the 700 kHz data recorded in October 2019.
The position of offshore ice margins, especially in the Baltic Sea, is poorly known. Based on hydroacoustic surveys, we mapped a field of submarine eskers on the seafloor of the shoal Adler Grund, southwestern Baltic Sea. The eskers comprise discontinuous, branching ridge structures with zigzag-shaped crests. These features are elevated up to 7 m above the surrounding seafloor with slope angles approaching 26o. The ridges are composed of gravel and boulders. Their interpretation as glacio-tectonic features is unlikely due to branching ridge crests and a continuous reflector at the base of several ridges. Based on their morphology and distribution, the ridges are interpreted as concertina eskers formed by meltwater outbursts close to an ice margin. Their good state of preservation indicates that the eskers were most likely formed during the last advance of the Weichselian glaciation across the study region.
It was doubted for a long time that in wave dominated coastal areas the impact of tsunami waves on shoreface deposits can be preserved. Following high resolution mapping with different hydroacoustic methods, positions for grab sampling and coring were identified, where tsunami deposits were supposed to occur. The sampled material was analyzed using a wide range of sedimentological, geochemical, micropalaeontological, chemical, and physical methods. Storm and tsunami event layers could be identified and distinguished. Individual layers, ranging from 12 - 39 cm in thickness, were interpreted as tsunami deposits. Run-up and backwash deposits could be distinguished. Based on foraminiferal transfer functions and textural analyses re-suspension of sediment during run-up seemed to be restricted to about 20 m water depth. On the other hand it could be shown by using PAHs as a chemical proxy that the loaded backwash extends up to 25 km offshore.