514 publications from this institution
The evolution of the mitochondrial genome towards the compact organization found in the higher eukaryotes is discussed. It is suggested that the machinery for co‐translational protein export across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane sets strict limits on the kinds of protein‐coding genes that can be successfully transferred from the mitochondrial to the nuclear genome. This hypothesis is in perfect agreement with the pattern of mitochondrially vs nuclearly encoded mitochondrial proteins found in species such as man, mouse, and Xenopus .
No abstract is provided for this article.
Many bacterial clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems employ the dual RNA–guided DNA endonuclease Cas9 to defend against invading phages and conjugative plasmids by introducing site-specific ...Read More
We describe improvements of the currently most popular method for prediction of classically secreted proteins, SignalP. SignalP consists of two different predictors based on neural network and hidden Markov model algorithms, where both components have been updated. Motivated by the idea that the cleavage site position and the amino acid composition of the signal peptide are correlated, new features have been included as input to the neural network. This addition, combined with a thorough error-correction of a new data set, have improved the performance of the predictor significantly over SignalP version 2. In version 3, correctness of the cleavage site predictions has increased notably for all three organism groups, eukaryotes, Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The accuracy of cleavage site prediction has increased in the range 6–17% over the previous version, whereas the signal peptide discrimination improvement is mainly due to the elimination of false-positive predictions, as well as the introduction of a new discrimination score for the neural network. The new method has been benchmarked against other available methods. Predictions can be made at the publicly available web server http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/
The role of the signal sequence in protein export is reviewed, and some difficulties inherent in the conventional picture of how it interacts with other components of the export machinery are pointed out. An alternative model is suggested, which seems to account better for some of the critical experimental findings made so far.
No abstract is provided for this article.
This chapter introduces the gist of the complete book as well as the particular topic discussed in each chapter. All living cells contain proteins that carry out specialized functions within various subcellular membrane or aqueous spaces. Bacterial cells have at least one membrane that separates the inside of the cell from its environment. Most proteins are synthesized in the cytoplasm of the cell, except for a small number that are encoded in the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes. This raises the question of how proteins are transported from the cytoplasm to other destinations within or outside of the cell. Proteins are imported directly from the cytoplasm into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria, peroxisomes, and chloroplasts by mechanisms that use a targeting sequence and a translocation machinery. In addition to importing proteins from the cytoplasm into the organelle, mitochondria and chloroplasts also export proteins from the mitochondrial matrix or the chloroplast stroma where proteins are encoded by their respective organellar genomes. Overall this chapter reveals that this book brings together a number of important topics in the protein localization field.
Translocation of proteins through the inner membrane of E. coli is normally catalyzed by the so‐called sec ‐machinery. Yet, many integral inner membrane proteins appear not to require a fully functional sec ‐machinery for proper insertion, in spite of the fact that sometimes quite sizable domains have to be translocated to the periplasmic side. This review will focus on recent studies of sec ‐independent translocation events in an attempt to pin‐point the main differences between sec ‐dependent and sec ‐independent translocation.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Conference Abstract| October 01 2000 Insertion of transmembrane helices into the ER membrane G. von Heijne G. von Heijne 1Dept. of Biochemistry, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Author and article information Publisher: Portland Press Ltd Online ISSN: 1470-8752 Print ISSN: 0300-5127 © 2000 Biochemical Society2000 Biochem Soc Trans (2000) 28 (5): A116. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst028a116 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Citation G. von Heijne; Insertion of transmembrane helices into the ER membrane. Biochem Soc Trans 1 October 2000; 28 (5): A116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/bst028a116 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsBiochemical Society Transactions Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2000 Biochemical Society2000 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
We have performed a comparative analysis of amino acid distributions in predicted integral membrane proteins from a total of 107 genomes. A procedure for identification of membrane spanning helices was optimized on a homology‐reduced data set of 170 multi‐spanning membrane proteins with experimentally determined topologies. The optimized method was then used for extraction of highly reliable partial topologies from all predicted membrane proteins in each genome, and the average biases in amino acid distributions between loops on opposite sides of the membrane were calculated. The results strongly support the notion that a biased distribution of Lys and Arg residues between cytoplasmic and extra‐cytoplasmic segments (the positive‐inside rule) is present in most if not all organisms. Proteins 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The possibility of translation being influenced by the messenger RNA secondary structure is investigated with the aid of a stochastic model. Simulations indicate that, at least for certain mRNA's, the mean ribosomal passage time decreases as the mean number of ribosomes on the messenger is increased. Furthermore, large variations in the passage times are found, in accordance with recent experimental results.