514 publications from this institution
No abstract is provided for this article.
Leader peptidase (Lep) is a membrane-bound enzyme of the Escherichia coli inner membrane that serves to remove signal peptides from exported proteins. Statistical and experimental studies of known signal peptides have defined a short C-terminal region that seems to provide the information for correct by Lep. Based on the patterns of conserved amino acids found in this region, we have designed a signal peptide cleavage cassette. This cassette is processed at the expected site when introduced after an uncleaved signal peptide. Furthermore, processing is blocked in the predicted manner when the (-3, -1)-rule for signal peptide is violated. This suggests that current understanding of the sequence requirements for signal peptide is sufficiently advanced to be used in, e.g. protein engineering applications.
Prediction of protein sorting signals from the sequence of amino acids has great importance in the field of proteomics today. Recently, the growth of protein databases, combined with machine learning approaches, such as neural networks and hidden Markov models, have made it possible to achieve a level of reliability where practical use in, for example automatic database annotation is feasible. In this review, we concentrate on the present status and future perspectives of SignalP, our neural network-based method for prediction of the most well-known sorting signal: the secretory signal peptide. We discuss the problems associated with the use of SignalP on genomic sequences, showing that signal peptide prediction will improve further if integrated with predictions of start codons and transmembrane helices. As a step towards this goal, a hidden Markov model version of SignalP has been developed, making it possible to discriminate between cleaved signal peptides and uncleaved signal anchors. Furthermore, we show how SignalP can be used to characterize putative signal peptides from an archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii. Finally, we briefly review a few methods for predicting other protein sorting signals and discuss the future of protein sorting prediction in general.
Membrane proteins fulfil many critical cellular functions, and make up a large fraction of all proteins. In fact, it has recently been estimated that as many as 35–-40% of all yeast genes may code for integral membrane proteins (1,2). Yet, only a handful of high resolution membrane protein three-dimensional structures are known, making it even more important to extract as much structural information as possible from the amino acid sequences. This chapter will focus on the topology prediction problem: how to identify transmembrane segments and how to predict the overall orientation of the protein in the membrane.
The secretory signal peptide is a ubiquitous protein-sorting signal that targets its passenger protein for translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in eukaryotes and the cytoplasmic membrane in prokaryotes1. Many methods have been published for predicting signal peptides from the amino acid sequence, including SignalP2,3,4, PrediSi5, SPEPlip6, Signal-CF7, Signal-3L8 and Signal-BLAST9. A benchmark study done in 2009 found SignalP 3.0 to be the best method10. All these methods, however, have only limited ability to distinguish between signal peptides and N-terminal transmembrane helices. Both peptides are hydrophobic, but transmembrane helices typically have longer hydrophobic regions. Also, transmembrane helices do not have cleavage sites, but the cleavage-site pattern is in itself not sufficient to distinguish the two types of sequence. This is a substantial problem because a scan for signal peptides in any complete genome will yield a lot of false positive predictions from N-terminal transmembrane regions.
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
The mechanism of voltage gating in K+ channels is controversial. The paddle model posits that highly charged voltage-sensor domains move relatively freely across the lipid bilayer in response to membrane depolarization; competing models picture the charged S4 voltage-sensor helix as being shielded from lipid contact by other parts of the protein. We measured the apparent free energy of membrane insertion of a K+-channel S4 helix into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and conclude that S4 is poised very near the threshold of efficient bilayer insertion. Our results suggest that the paddle model is not inconsistent with the high charge content of S4.