514 publications from this institution
By in vitro transcription/translation of model proteins in the presence of dog pancreas microsomes, we have measured the minimum distance of an acceptor site from the lumenal end of a transmembrane segment required for N-linked glycosylation, both when the acceptor site is placed N-and C-terminally to the membrane anchor.We observe a sharp threshold at a distance of 12-14 residues, suggesting that the oligosaccharyltransferase active site is 30-40 A above the membrane and is oriented roughly parallel to the membrane surface.
Integral membrane proteins have parts of their polypeptide backbones embedded in a phospholipid bilayer. These hydrophobic, membrane-spanning domains are separated by hydrophilic segments exposed to the aqueous environment and seem to fall into two basic modalities: a-helix bundle and anti-parallel /3-barrel membrane domains. For the helix bundle proteins, two easily identifiable features appear to be the major structural determinants: the long apolar stretches that form the transmembrane a-helices, and the biased distribution of charged residues in the polar regions, known as the 'positive-inside' rule (von Heijne, 1986). Recently, attempts to predict topologies of eukaryotic and prokaryotic integral membrane proteins that form a-helical structures, have been reported (von Heijne, 1992; Sipos and von Heijne, 1993). This work has indeed shown that the topology of such proteins can be effectively deduced from the amino acid sequence. Thus, the aim of developing TopPred II is to compile all existing knowledge about topology in order to permit easy access to prediction of membrane protein topologies. TopPred II is an improved version of the preceding freeware TOP-PRED (von Heijne, 1992). It is now a stand-alone application written in Symantec THINK Pascal to allow its operation on any Macintosh computer with a 6.0.2 (or beyond) system, respecting the standard Apple file- and window-handling procedures, and making extensive use of the graphic abilities of Macintosh computers. The compiled program is very compact (~90 kbytes) and all the default parameters, scales and texts have been built into resources to allow easy access and ability for permanent modifications by the user. Input sequence files are limited to 2000 amino acids. Sequences can be handled one by one or in groups of up to 20. Parameters and scales can be easily modified through standard dialogs, which also enable one to re-establish the TopPred II default values. Calculation of the hydrophobicity profile, transmembrane segments and topologies (see below) can be requested. All the displayed results (texts as well as graphics) can be printed out or saved in files that can be imported by other programs.
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Recent work has shown that efficient di- or trimerization of hydrophobic transmembrane helices in detergent micelles or lipid bilayers can be driven by inter-helix hydrogen bonding involving polar residues such as Asn or Asp. Using in vitro translation in the presence of rough microsomes of a model integral membrane protein, we now show that the formation of so-called helical hairpins, two tightly spaced transmembrane helices connected by a short loop, can likewise be promoted by the introduction of Asn-Asn or Asp-Asp pairs in a long transmembrane hydrophobic segment. These observations suggest that inter-helix hydrogen bonds can form within the context of the Sec61 translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum, implying that hydrophobic segments in a nascent polypeptide chain in transit through the Sec61 channel have immediate access to a non-aqueous subcompartment within the translocon.
Representative samples of mitochondrial and chloroplast targetting peptides have been analyzed in terms of amino acid composition, positional amino acid preferences and amphiphilic character. No highly conserved ‘homology blocks’ are found in either class of topogenic sequence. Mitochondrial‐matrix‐targeting peptides are composed of two domains with different amphiphilic properties. Arginine is frequently found either at position –10 or –2 relative to the cleavage site, suggesting that some targeting peptides may be cleaved twice in succession by two different matrix proteases. In stroma‐targeting chloroplast transit peptides three distinct regions are evident: an uncharged amino‐terminal domain, a central domain lacking acidic residues and a carboxy‐terminal domain with the potential to form an amphiphilic β‐strand. Targeting peptides that route proteins to the mitochondrial intermembrane space or the lumen of chloroplast thylakoids have a mosaic design with an aminoterminal matrix‐or stroma‐targeting part attached to a carboxy‐terminal extension that shares many characteristics with secretory signal peptides.
This chapter reveals that the targeting sequences direct proteins to the correct cellular compartment. Protein secretion in eukaryotic, bacterial, and archaeal cells depends on N-terminal signal peptides. The signal peptide is usually cleaved off by a signal peptidase, although some proteins have noncleaved signal peptides. Tat signal peptides are not recognized by the SRP or other components of the Sec machinery. Most soluble matrix proteins have N-terminal mitochondrial targeting peptides that are removed by a matrix-localized protease upon import. Sequence analysis, mutational studies, and structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) have shown that an ability to form a positively charged, amphiphilic-helix is critical for the import function, as seen most clearly in the recently determined structure of a targeting peptide bound to a domain of the outer membrane receptor Tom20. Many intermembrane space proteins have bipartite targeting signals, where a typical matrix-targeting peptide is followed by a second targeting peptide with similarities to Sec-type signal peptides. Once imported into the stroma, some chloroplast proteins need to be further sorted to the lumen of the thylakoids. Overall this chapter reviews the main classes of “primary” targeting signals—secretory signal peptides, nuclear localization signals, mitochondrial targeting peptides, peroxisomal targeting sequences, and chloroplast transit peptides.