Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a fatal disease characterized by progressive destruction of the lung. Although TLR2 bridges innate and adaptive immunity by sensing tissue damage, its role in pulmonary fibrosis remains unclear. To address this issue, TLR2(-/-) and WT mice were examined for bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis (BIPF). Flow cytometric and immunohistochemical analysis revealed that TLR2 expression in bronchial epithelial and immune cells of the lungs was upregulated in WT mice during BIPF. Levels of IL-27, TGF-β, chemokines, and hydroxyproline were lower in lungs of TLR2(-/-) mice than in those of WT mice, but IL-17 levels were higher in TLR2(-/-) mice. In in vivo experiments using bone marrow-chimeric mice, TLR2 expression on respiratory epithelial cells, rather than immune cells, induced IL-27 and chemokine production in the lungs, further stimulating BIPF. This effect of TLR2 depended on IRF complexes and MyD88. BIPF was more severe in IL-17A(-/-) mice and in TLR2(-/-) mice treated with anti-IL-17 mAb than in TLR2(-/-) and WT mice. Furthermore, IL-27 blockade in WT mice reduced hydroxyproline levels by enhancing IL-17 production, whereas the treatment of TLR2(-/-) mice with a chemokine mixture increased hydroxyproline levels by recruiting inflammatory cells into the lungs. TLR2 signaling promotes BIPF by inducing IL-27 and chemokine production by respiratory epithelial cells, thereby inhibiting IL-17 production and recruiting inflammatory cells into the lungs.
The mucosal host defence discriminates pathogens from commensals, and prevents infection while allowing the normal flora to persist. Paradoxically, Toll-like receptors (TLR) control the mucosal defence against pathogens, even though the TLR recognise conserved molecules like LPS, which are shared between pathogens and commensals. This study proposes a mechanism of pathogen-specific mucosal TLR4 activation, involving adhesive ligands and their host cell receptors. TLR4 signalling was activated in CD14-negative, LPS-unresponsive epithelial cells by P fimbriated, uropathogenic Escherichia coli but not by a mutant lacking fimbriae. Epithelial TLR4 signalling in vivo involved the glycosphingolipid receptors for P fimbriae and the adaptor proteins Toll/IL-1R (TIR) domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-beta (TRIF)/TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM), but myeloid differentiation protein 88 (MyD88)/TIR domain-containing adaptor protein were not required for the epithelial response. Substituting the P fimbriae with type 1 fimbriae changed TLR4 signalling from the TRIF to the MyD88 adaptor pathway. In addition, the adaptor proteins and the fimbrial type were found to influence bacterial clearance. Trif(-/-) and Tram(-/-) mice remained infected with P fimbriated E. coli but cleared the type 1 fimbriated strain, while Myd88(-/-) mice became carriers of both the P and the type 1 fimbriated bacteria. Thus, TLR4 may be engaged specifically by pathogens, when the proper cell surface receptors are engaged by virulence ligands.
No abstract is provided for this article.
The interleukin 6 (IL-6) promoter is rapidly and transiently activated by other cytokines, including IL-1 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF), as well as by phorbol esters and cyclic AMP agonists. Studies using promoter mutants suggested that an IL-1-responsive element mapped within the – 180 to – 123 region of the IL-6 promoter. A nuclear factor (NF-IL6) that recognized a unique sequence containing an inverted repeat, ACATTGCACAATCT, was identified within the region. Direct cloning of the human NF-IL6 revealed its similarity to C/EBP, a liver- and adipose tissue-specific transcription factor. C/EBP and NF-IL6 recognize the same nucleotide sequence, but exhibit distinct patterns of expression. NF-IL6 is expressed at a low level in normal tissues, but is rapidly and drastically induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, TNF and IL-6. Recently, NF-IM has been shown to be identical to ILdDBP, the DNA-binding protein which is responsible for IL-6-mediated induction of several acute-phase proteins. Evidence that NF-IL6 DNA-binding activity is increased after IL-6 stimulation without increased NF-IL6 protein synthesis demonstrates the importance of post-translational modification. There are some results indicating that phosphorylation is involved in transcriptional and binding activities of NF-IL6. Taken together, these findings indicate that NF-IL6 may be an important transcription factor on the signal transduction pathways of IL-1 and IL-6.