Abstract In chick embryo fibroblast cultures the 15‐ to 30‐fold enhancement of D‐glucose uptake observed when cells are starved of glucose for 24 hours is not duplicated for derivatives of glucose that compete effectively for uptake and have generally been considered to use the same carrier. 2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose, D‐mannose, D‐galactose and D‐glucosamine are derepressed progressively less sharply in that order with glucosamine uptake never more than doubled by starvation. D‐glucose at a concentration of 5.5 mM in the 24‐hour conditioning medium is a strong “repressor” resulting in low “transport” behavior for each of the five sugars cited. D‐glucosamine is equally effective at the same concentration. A 10‐fold reduction in the concentration of glucosamine (0.55 mM) allows for the escape from repression of mannose, glucose, and deoxyglucose uptake while the others remain repressed. Mannose uptake escapes as well when the glucose concentration in the “conditioning” medium is similarly reduced. Under certain conditions of starvation and cell density dramatic effects of supplemental stimulation by insulin can be achieved. Insulin withdrawal interrupts the supplemental stimulation process. Cycloheximide, actinomycin D and cordycepin block both non‐insulin and insulin‐induced derepression. Short exposure (15–30 minutes) of 24‐hour starved cells to glucose (5.5 mM) reduces glucose sharply but does not affect 3‐O‐methyl glucose uptake. If the exposure is to 2‐deoxyglucose (5.5 mM) further derepression of glucose uptake results.
Objectives To address reproductive and contraceptive issues in adolescent girls with chronic medical conditions in order to assist health-care providers when they counsel teenagers about contraceptive methods.
Selecting (near) optimal intensity measures (IMs) for seismic fragility assessment is fundamental for the accurate and unbiased assessment of risk. While moderate/long‐period structures benefit from a variety of well‐established options, short‐period structures and their non‐structural components (NSCs) present a more ambiguous scenario. Mainly driven by nuclear power plant studies, it is the peak ground acceleration (PGA) that has long been the default choice. Challenging this notion, we test IM candidates ranging from single‐period spectral acceleration (Sa) ordinates to geometric averages over a range of periods (AvgSa). Featuring both on‐ground NSCs and on‐structure ones, we encompass a spectrum of short‐period structures and short‐period components. Invariably, if one has the luxury of employing NSC‐specific IMs, Sa at the fundamental period of the component tends to yield the best results. In the more general case, though, certain AvgSa options whose period range starts at 0.01–0.10s and ends at 0.40–0.50s, provide a consistently improved (or at worst equal performance) compared to PGA, for a wide variety of NSCs with periods ranging from 0.05 to 0.90s.