<title>Abstract</title> Due to their lightness and simple connectivity, steel racking systems are typically considered as “low-dissipative” structures, which is reflected in the modern seismic codes by the absence of capacity design and the adoption of low behaviour factors. This limited capability of stress redistribution significantly increases the vulnerability of racks under beyond-design seismic hazards and raises the demand for more resilient designs. Along these lines, the proposed Plastic Ovalization Strategy (POS) attempts to increase the ductility of the individual upright frames comprising the cross-aisle direction of racks, and at the same time to preserve their low-cost and easy-to-assemble nature. This is achieved by tasking the bearing failure mechanism of the diagonal bolt hole to absorb seismic deformations, while capacity design is employed to keep the rest of the structure in the elastic zone. Following a detailed discussion on the motives and basic principles of the strategy, two high-rise racking systems are designed twice by professional engineers, once using standard approaches and then by additionally employing the proposed POS rules. Finally, the two design solutions are compared by conducting a comprehensive seismic assessment, which employs a phenomenological macro-model comprising elastic elements and nonlinear springs to simulate the bearing failure mechanism.
OPINION article Front. Immunol., 29 June 2021Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders Volume 12 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.684490
Summary A series of scalar and vector intensity measures is examined to determine their suitability within the seismic risk assessment of liquid storage tanks. Using a surrogate modelling approach on a squat tank that is examined under both anchored and unanchored support conditions, incremental dynamic analysis is adopted to generate the distributions of response parameters conditioned on each of the candidate intensity measures. Efficiency and sufficiency metrics are used in order to perform the intensity measure evaluation for individual failure modes, while a comparison in terms of mean annual frequency of exceedance is performed with respect to a damage state that is mutually governed by the impulsive and convective modes of the tank. The results reveal combinations of spectral acceleration ordinates as adequate predictors, among which the average spectral acceleration is singled out as the optimal solution. The sole exception is found for the sloshing‐controlled modes of failure, where mainly the convective period spectral acceleration is deemed adequate to represent the associated response due to their underlying linear relationship. A computationally efficient method in terms of site hazard analysis is finally proposed to serve in place of the vector‐valued intensity measures, providing a good match for the unanchored tank considered and a more conservative one for the corresponding anchored system.
In structural dynamics, the inertia of accelerated masses and the cornucopia of phenomena that contribute to damping have a significant influence on the internal forces and deformation of building structures.Typical problems of structural dynamics are the prediction of the vibration response of dynamically excited structures, for instance, induced by earthquakes, the identification of structural parameters based on the dynamic response, and the design of vibration-mitigating measures from the fundamental study to the implementation.Many traditional methods of structural dynamics and earthquake engineering are based on empirical approaches rather than rigorous application of fundamental mechanical principles.However, dramatic advances in mechanics now make it increasingly possible not only to model but also to solve and predict complex phenomena in dynamics.We are very pleased that, in response to these advances, this special issue of Acta Mechanica provides an insight into the latest mechanics-based developments in various branches of structural dynamics and earthquake engineering.It contains 20 contributions that we selected based on the reactions and feedback we received to our invitation.The first four papers deal with complex dynamic vehicle-bridge interaction (VBI).In the first paper, Homaei et al. [1] investigate the effect of VBI and highlight its similarities and differences to the effect of vibration dampers under earthquake excitation.Based on knowledge of recent experimental studies, König and Adam [2] present a new modeling approach for railway bridges under high-speed traffic, which takes into account both the horizontal and vertical interaction between track and structure.Hirzinger and Nackenhorst [3] apply a model-correction-based strategy for efficient reliability analysis of the uncertain VBI system, where a low-fidelity model is calibrated to the corresponding high-fidelity model close to the most probable point.The paper of Lei et al. [4] proposes a two-step bridge damage detection method based on wavelet transform analysis of the residual contact response of the moving front and rear vehicle wheels to reduce the impact of road surface roughness.Suitably, the next paper by Yang et al.[5] uses a numerical model based on the wave finite element method of wave propagation and attenuation in periodic supported rail, capturing the complex cross-section deformation of the waves.Changing topics away from railways, Amendola et al. [6] also seek a waveform solution but of nonlocal nanobeams dissipating thermal energy by radiation, employing an extension of Type II Green-Naghdi theory.The paper by Abdelnour and Zabel [7] is devoted to the identification of the modal information of complex three-dimensional space truss structures characterized by closely spaced modes as well as global and local vibration mechanisms.Pirrotta and Russotto [8], on the other hand, develop a new