In a recent interesting paper Babaei and Stewart [1] demonstrated that coculture of endothelial cells (ECs) with smooth muscle cells (SMCs) may result in the formation of extensive capillary-like structure. However, the effect was observed only when SMCs were previously transfected with vector containing the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) cDNA. Such an in vitro angiogenic-like events were abrogated by l-NAME, a NOS inhibitor. A similar angiogenic response has been observed when SMCs were transfected with plasmids containing VEGF121 cDNA, the effect again being inhibited by l-NAME. Similarly, in a Boyden chamber model the EC migration was potently enhanced in the presence of SMC transfected with eNOS or VEGF121, and was significantly attenuated by l-NAME. Much evidence indicates that NO plays an integral role in VEGF signaling (see Ref. [1]). It has …
Reprogramming of somatic cells with defined transcription factors which leads to the acquisition of pluripotent phenotype requires many modifications in gene expression profile, metabolism and chromatin structure. MicroRNAs, a short non-coding RNA that inhibit translation of recognized mRNA sequences play an important role in this process. Because of the pleiotropism of their action microRNAs regulate subsequent steps in cellular reprogramming, among others activation of p53, mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and development of embryonic gene expression profile. Further studies on the function of microRNA in reprogramming can increase our understandbing of generation, maintenance and differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Abstract Despite extensive studies, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a neuromuscular disorder caused by the lack of dystrophin, a key muscle structural protein, remains an incurable disease. One of the potential treatment options currently being investigated is cell therapy, although it has not yet been clinically established. Several strategies, including muscle satellite cells, mesoangioblasts (vessel-associated multipotent stem cells), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived muscle cells, have emerged as tools for restoring dystrophin expression and regenerating damaged muscle tissue. Nevertheless, each of these approaches faces significant limitations, including poor cell engraftment, low delivery efficiency, and the risk of immune rejection. Furthermore, long-term safety, the possibility of tumorigenicity, and off-target effects must be rigorously evaluated. Importantly, the latter technology, utilizing cardiomyocytes differentiated from iPSC, holds the potential for addressing cardiomyopathy, the major cause of death of DMD patients. At the same time, several interventions using cells with claimed stem cell potential have emerged, raising both scientific and ethical concerns. This review summarizes recent advancements in the development of cell therapies for DMD, highlighting promising progress while critically analysing questionable approaches.
In the majority of potential applications gene therapy will require an effective transfer of a transgene in vivo resulting in high-level and long-term transgene expression, all in the absence of significant toxicity or inflammatory responses. The most efficient vehicles for delivery of foreign genes to the target tissues are modified adenoviruses. Adenoviral vectors of the first generation, despite the high infection efficacy, have an essential drawback: they induce strong immune response, which leads to short term expression of the transgene, and limits their usefulness in clinical trials. In contrast, helper-dependent adenoviral vectors (HdAd) lacking all viral coding sequences display only minimal immunogenicity and negligible side-effects, allowing for long-term transgene expression. Thus, HdAd vehicles have become the carrier of choice for adenoviral vector-mediated experimental gene therapy, effectively used in animal models for delivery of transgenes into the liver, skeletal muscle, myocardium or brain. Strong and long-lasting expression of therapeutic genes has allowed for successful treatment of dyslipidemias, muscular dystrophy, obesity, hemophilia, and diabetes. Additionally, the large cloning capacity of HdAd, up to 37 kb, facilitates the use of physiologically regulated, endogenous promoters, instead of artificial viral promoter sequences. This enables also generation of the single vectors expressing multiple genes, which can be potentially useful for treatment of polygenic diseases. In this review we characterize the basic features of HdAd vectors and describe some of their experimental and potential clinical applications.
Carbon monoxide: pro- or anti-angiogenic agent? Comment on Ahmad et al. (Thromb Haemost 2015; 113: 329–337) -
Disease status of AS appears to be associated with elevated VEGF plasma levels. Whether this reflects inflammation or a truly angiogenic pathomechanism requires further investigation.
Summary: Background: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) is a ligand inducible transcription factor expressed mainly in adipose tissue and involved in regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism.Methods: Among the exogenous PPARγ ligands are thiazolidinediones (TZDs, insulin sensitizers), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), whereas the endogenous inducers comprise prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) and prostaglandin J2 (PGJ2). Ligands of PPARγ are also involved in regulation of inflammation and angiogenesis.Results: Recently PPARγ has been detected in endothelium, vascular smooth muscle cells, and, to the highest extent, in macrophages/foam cells within atherosclerotic plaques.Conclusions: Here we summarize the possible roles played by PPARγ in the vessel wall. Zusammenfassung: Grundlagen: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) ist ein Liganden-induzierbarer Transkriptionsfaktor, der hauptsächlich im adipösen Gewebe exprimiert wird und in die Regulation der Lipid- und Glukosemetabolismen involviert ist.Methodik: Zu den exogenen PPARγ-Liganden gehören die Thiazolidindione (TZDs) und die nicht-steroidalen Antiphlogistika (NSAID). Prostaglandin D2 (PgD2) und Prostaglandin J2 (PgJ2) können PPARγ endogen induzieren. Die Liganden von PPARγ sind auch in der Regulation von Entzündung und Angiogenese involviert.Ergebnisse: Vor kurzem konnte PPARγ im Endothel, in den glatten Gefäßmuskulaturzellen und mit der höchsten Konzentration in Makrophagen/Schaumzellen in atherosklerotischen Plaques gemessen werden.Schlußfolgerungen: Wir fassen hier die möglichen Rollen, die PPARγ in der Gefäßwand spielt, zusammen.