336 publications from this institution
The paper considers the specifics, strengths and weaknesses of available remote sensing products within major steps and modules of a verified terrestrial ecosystems full carbon account (FCA) of Russia's land. The methodology used is based on system integration of all available information sources and major methods of carbon accounting using IIASA's landscape-ecosystem approach for overall designing of the account. A multi-sensor remote sensing concept is a corner stone of the methodology being substantially used for (1) georeferencing and parametrization of land cover and its change, (2) assessment of important biophysical and ecological parameters of ecosystems and landscapes, and (3) assessment of the impacts of environmental conditions on ecosystem productivity and disturbance regimes. System integration and mutual constraints of remote sensing and ground information allow for substantially decreasing uncertainty of the FCA. In the Russian case-study, the net ecosystem carbon balance of Russia for an individual year (2009) is estimated with uncertainty at 25-30% (CI 0.9), that presumably should satisfy current requirements to the FCA at the national (continental) scale.
No abstract is provided for this article.
A number of global and regional maps of forest extent are available, but when compared spatially, there are large areas of disagreement. Moreover, there was no global forest map that is consistent with forest statistics from FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). By combining these diverse data sources into a single forest cover product, it is possible to produce a global forest map that is more accurate than the individual input layers and to produce a map that is consistent with FAO statistics. In this paper we applied geographically weighted regression (GWR) to integrate eight different forest products into three global hybrid forest cover maps at a 1 km resolution for the reference year 2000. Input products included global land cover and forest maps at varying resolutions from 30 m to 1 km, mosaics of regional land use/land cover products where available, and the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields product. The GWR was trained using crowdsourced data collected via the Geo-Wiki platform and the hybrid maps were then validated using an independent dataset collected via the same system. Three different hybrid maps were produced: two consistent with FAO statistics, one at the country and one at the regional level, and a “best guess” forest cover map that is independent of FAO. Independent validation showed that the “best guess” hybrid product had the best overall accuracy of 93% when compared with the individual input datasets. The global hybrid forest cover maps are available at http://biomass.geo-wiki.org. More details can be found in the paper: Schepaschenko D., See L., Lesiv M., McCallum I., Fritz S., et al. (2015). Development of a global hybrid forest mask through the synergy of remote sensing, crowdsourcing and FAO statistics. <em>Remote Sensing of Environment </em>162 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.011. The data set consists of following files: 1. for2000_bg.zip - Global forest mask "best guess" - percentage forest cover at a 1 km spatial resolution for the year 2000;<br> 2. for2000_ca_cou.zip - Global forest mask calibrated to the FAO FRA statistics at national scale;<br> 3. for2000_ca_reg.zip - Global forest mask calibrated to the FAO FRA statistics at continental scale;<br> 4. training_pc.csv - training data, which contains visual interpretation of very high resolution imagery at 20159 locations;<br> 5. validation.csv - validation data, which contains visual interpretation of very high resolution imagery at 1816 locations.
This dataset contains key characteristics about the data described in the Data Descriptor The Forest Observation System, building a global reference dataset for remote sensing of forest biomass. <br> Contents: <br> 1. human readable metadata summary table in CSV format 2. machine readable metadata file in JSON format <br><br>Versioning Note:A revised version was generated when the metadata format was updated from JSON to JSON-LD. This was an automatic process that changed only the format, not the contents, of the metadata.