802 publications from this institution
We analyze the u-plane contribution to Donaldson invariants of a four-manifold X.For b^X) > 1, this contribution vanishes, but for b'z = 1, the Donaldson invariants must be written as the sum of a uplane integral and an SW contribution.The w-plane integrals are quite intricate, but can be analyzed in great detail and even calculated.By analyzing the tz-plane integrals, the relation of Donaldson theory to J\f -2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory can be described much more fully, the relation of Donaldson invariants to SW theory can be generalized to four-manifolds not of simple type, and interesting formulas can be obtained for the class numbers of imaginary quadratic fields.We also show how the results generalize to extensions of Donaldson theory obtained by including hypermultiplet matter fields.
For various reasons, it seems necessary to include complex saddle points in the Euclidean path integral of General Relativity. But some sort of restriction on the allowed complex saddle points is needed to avoid various unphysical examples. In this article, a speculative proposal is made concerning a possible restriction on the allowed saddle points in the gravitational path integral. The proposal is motivated by recent work of Kontsevich and Segal on complex metrics in quantum field theory, and earlier work of Louko and Sorkin on topology change from a real time point of view.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Choose from multiple link options via Crossref
1124 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 45, NUMBER 9 I n the twentieth century, the quest for deeper understanding of the laws of nature has largely revolved around the development of two great theories: namely, general relativity and quantum mechanics. General relativity is, of course, Einstein’s theory according to which gravitation results from the curvature of space and time; the mathematical framework is that of Riemannian geometry. While previously spacetime was understood as a fixed arena, given ab initio, in which physics unfolds, in general relativity spacetime evolves dynamically, according to the Einstein equations. Part of the problem of physics, according to this theory, is to determine, given the initial conditions as input, how spacetime will develop in the future. The influence of general relativity in twentiethcentury mathematics has been clear enough. Learning that Riemannian geometry is so central in physics gave a big boost to its growth as a mathematical subject; it developed into one of the most fruitful branches of mathematics, with applications in many other areas. While in physics general relativity is used to understand the behavior of astronomical bodies and the universe as a whole, quantum mechanics is used primarily to understand atoms, molecules, and subatomic particles. Quantum theory has had a much more complex history than general relativity, and in some sense most of its influence on mathematics belongs to the twenty-first century. The quantum theory of particles—which is more commonly called nonrelativistic quantum mechanics—was put in its modern form by 1925 and has greatly influenced the development of functional analysis, and other areas. But the deeper part of quantum theory is the quantum theory of fields, which arises when one tries to combine quantum mechanics with special relativity (the precursor of general relativity, in which the speed of light is the same in every inertial frame but spacetime is still flat and given ab initio). This much more difficult theory, developed from the late 1920s to the present, encompasses most of what we know of the laws of physics, except gravity. In its seventy years there have been many milestones, ranging from the theory of “antimatter”, which emerged around 1930, to a more precise description of atoms, which quantum field theory provided by 1950, to the “standard model of particle physics” (governing the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions), which emerged by the early 1970s, to new predictions in our own time that one hopes to test in present and future accelerators. Quantum field theory is a very rich subject for mathematics as well as physics. But its development in the last seventy years has been mainly by physicists, and it is still largely out of reach as a rigorous mathematical theory despite important efforts in constructive field theory. So most of its impact on mathematics has not yet been felt. Yet in many active areas of mathematics, problems are Edward Witten is professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study. His e-mail address is witten@ias.edu.
No abstract is provided for this article.
These are notes on the theory of supermanifolds and integration on them, aiming to collect results that are useful for a better understanding of superstring perturbation theory in the RNS formalism.
No abstract is provided for this article.
String theory avoids the ultraviolet infinities that arise in trying to quantize gravity. It is also more predictive than conventional quantum field theory, one aspect of this being the way that it contributed to the emergence of the concept of ``supersymmetry'' of particle interactions. There are hints from the successes of supersymmetric unified theories of particle interactions that supersymmetry is relevant to elementary particles at energies close to current accelerator energies; if this is so, it will be confirmed experimentally and supersymmetry is then also likely to be important in cosmology, in connection with dark matter, baryogenesis, and/or inflation. Magnetic monopoles play an important role in the structure of string theory, and thus should certainly exist, if string theory is correct, though they may have been diluted by inflation to an unobservable level. The monopole mass in many attractive models is near the Planck mass, but, if unification of elementary particle forces with gravity occurs near TeV energies through large or warped extra dimensions, as in some recent models, then monopoles should be below 100 TeV and in an astrophysical context would be ultrarelativistic. In such models, supersymmetry would definitely be expected at TeV energies.
No abstract is provided for this article.
We present a new construction of the quantum Hubert space of Chern-Simons gauge theory using methods which are natural from the threedimensional point of view.To show that the quantum Hubert space associated to a Riemann surface Σ is independent of the choice of complex structure on Σ, we construct a natural projectively flat connection on the quantum Hubert bundle over Teichmuller space.This connection has been previously constructed in the context of two-dimensional conformal field theory where it is interpreted as the stress energy tensor.Our construction thus gives a (2 + 1 )-dimensional derivation of the basic properties of (1 + 1)-dimensional current algebra.To construct the connection we show generally that for affine symplectic quotients the natural projectively flat connection on the quantum Hubert bundle may be expressed purely in terms of the intrinsic Kahler geometry of the quotient and the Quillen connection on a certain determinant line bundle.The proof of most of the properties of the connection we construct follows surprisingly simply from the index theorem identities for the curvature of the Quillen connection.As an example, we treat the case when Σ has genus one explicitly.We also make some preliminary comments concerning the Hubert space structure.
A new mathematical framework for the Wess-Zumino chiral effective action is described. It is shown that this action obeys an a priori quantization law, analogous to Dirac's quantization of magnetic change. It incorporates in current algebra both perturbative and non-perturbative anomalies.
We generalize the recently discovered relationship between JT gravity and double-scaled random matrix theory to the case that the boundary theory may have time-reversal symmetry and may have fermions with or without supersymmetry. The matching between variants of JT gravity and matrix ensembles depends on the assumed symmetries. Time-reversal symmetry in the boundary theory means that unorientable spacetimes must be considered in the bulk. In such a case, the partition function of JT gravity is still related to the volume of the moduli space of conformal structures, but this volume has a quantum correction and has to be computed using Reidemeister-Ray-Singer torsion. Presence of fermions in the boundary theory (and thus a symmetry $(-1)^F$) means that the bulk has a spin or pin structure. Supersymmetry in the boundary means that the bulk theory is associated to JT supergravity and is related to the volume of the moduli space of super Riemann surfaces rather than of ordinary Riemann surfaces. In all cases we match JT gravity or supergravity with an appropriate random matrix ensemble. All ten standard random matrix ensembles make an appearance -- the three Dyson ensembles and the seven Altland-Zirnbauer ensembles. To facilitate the analysis, we extend to the other ensembles techniques that are most familiar in the case of the original Wigner-Dyson ensemble of hermitian matrices. We also generalize Mirzakhani's recursion for the volumes of ordinary moduli space to the case of super Riemann surfaces.
The non-perturbative superpotential can be effectively calculated in M-theory compactification to three dimensions on a Calabi-Yau four-fold X. For certain X, the superpotential is identically zero, while for other X, a non-perturbative superpotential is generated. Using F-theory, these results carry over to certain Type IIB and heterotic string compactifications to four dimensions with N = 1 supersymmetry. In the heterotic string case, the non-perturbative superpotential can be interpreted as coming from space-time and world-sheet instantons; in many simple cases contributions come only from finitely many values of the instanton numbers.
The supersymmetric string of Schwarz and Green [1] is a variant of the old fermionic string theory of Ramond-Neveu-Schwarz [2]. It is consistent only in ten dimensions and apparently must be interpreted in the sense of a Kaluza-Klein theory, the ten dimensions consisting of four Minkowskian ones and six compact ones.
We re-examine quantization via branes with the goal of understanding its relation to geometric quantization. If a symplectic manifold $M$ can be quantized in geometric quantization using a polarization ${\mathcal P}$, and in brane quantization using a complexification $Y$, then the two quantizations agree if ${\mathcal P}$ can be analytically continued to a holomorphic polarization of $Y$. We also show, roughly, that the automorphism group of $M$ that is realized as a group of symmetries in brane quantization of $M$ is the group of symplectomorphisms of $M$ that can be analytically continued to holomorphic symplectomorphisms of $Y$. We describe from the point of view of brane quantization several examples in which geometric quantization with different polarizations gives equivalent results.
The connection of recently constructed lower dimensional heterotic strings with conventional toroidal compactification is clarified.
No abstract is provided for this article.
These notes are devoted to explaining aspects of the mirror manifold problem that can be naturally understood from the point of view of topological field theory. Basically this involves studying the topological field theories made by twisting $N=2$ sigma models. This is mainly a review of old results, except for the discussion in \S7 of certain facts that may be relevant to constructing the ``mirror map'' between mirror moduli spaces.
