6,963 publications from this institution
Purpose: The second generation everolimus eluting vascular scaffold (BVS) has been evaluated in the ABSORB clinical trial program. Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) were excluded from those trials and at the current state of the art, no data are available on the performance of the BVS in patients presenting with ACS with or without ST-segment elevation (STEMI and NSTEMI). We report for the first time data after implantation of the BVS specifically in patients with ACS. Methods: Unselected consecutive patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation (STEMI or NSTEMI) were implanted with second generation BVS. Procedural data and short-term clinical outcomes were prospectively evaluated. Results: A total of 49 patients presenting with ACS (35 NSTEMI and 13 STEMI) were implanted with second generation BVS. Mean age was 59±10 years, male gender in 78% of cases; the majority of lesion were located in left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD 53%, CX 23%, RCA 24%); moderate or severe calcification were observed in 46% of lesions. BVS was successfully implanted in 96% of cases (in 2 cases, 1NSTEMI and 1STEMI, the BVS failed in crossing the lesion). BVS overlap was performed in 12 patents and in 2 cases bifurcation lesions were successfully treated with provisional approach. The mean follow-up period was 73±41 days and no cases of target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, cardiac death and scaffold thrombosis were reported. Conclusions: The present report is the first investigating the performance of second generation BVS in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Our data suggest feasibility of implantation of this novel device in patients with NSTEMI or STEMI with a high procedural success rate and excellent short-term clinical outcomes.
An experimental investigation has been conducted into the degree of shear interaction between cold-formed steel floor joists and wood-based flooring panels and the resulting benefits derived in terms of composite action. A series of four-point bending tests have been carried out to evaluate the overall system behavior, while material tests have been performed to accurately define the material properties of each component of the examined system. Two different shear transfer mechanisms were examined: self-drilling screws with varying spacing and structural adhesive. The bare system was also tested to provide a reference response, against which the stiffness and capacity of the composite system could be bench-marked. The experiments showed that significant benefit could be derived as a result of composite action with as much as a 100% increase in bending capacity and 42% increase in stiffness.
Educational aims To discuss the similarities and differences in inflammation between COPD and asthma To consider the clinical relevance of these differences To speculate about the therapeutic implications of this basic research
Background: Numerous randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of thin-strut biodegradable polymer second-generation drug-eluting stent to the first-generation drug-eluting stent and the noninferiority to the thin-strut second-generation permanent polymer drug-eluting stent. Data on long-term clinical outcomes with a novel ultrathin drug-eluting stent, to date, are limited. Methods: The DESSOLVE III trial (Multicenter Randomized Study of the MiStent Sirolimus Eluting Absorbable Polymer Stent System for Revascularization of Coronary Arteries; n=1398) is a prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, all-comers, randomized controlled trial (NCT02385279), allocating in a 1:1 ratio to either ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer MiStent sirolimus-eluting stent or to thin-strut permanent polymer Xience everolimus-eluting stent. The primary end point was device-oriented composite end point, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. The secondary end point was patient-oriented composite end point, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization. Results: At 3 years, follow-up data were available in 1381 patients (98.8%). The primary end point of device-oriented composite end point occurred in 10.5% for MiStent sirolimus-eluting stent and in 11.5% for Xience everolimus-eluting stent ( P =0.55). Rates of cardiac death (3.9% versus 3.8%; P =0.88), target vessel myocardial infarction (3.2% versus 2.5%; P =0.43), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (5.2% versus 6.5%; P =0.30) did not differ significantly between the 2 devices. The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was infrequent and similar between the 2 arms (1.2% versus 1.5%; P =0.64). The 90-day landmark analysis showed no significant difference in device-oriented composite end point between the 2 groups after polymer degradation of MiStent. The risk of patient-oriented composite end point was comparable between the 2 groups (22.7% versus 22.9%; P =0.34). Conclusions: In the DESSOLVE III trial, early safety and efficacy with MiStent sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent are confirmed at a longer term follow-up when compared with Xience everolimus-eluting permanent polymer-coated stent in a large all-comers population. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02385279.