6,963 publications from this institution
To determine the incidence, timing and predictors of periprocedural valve dislodgment with the Medtronic Corevalve System (MCS).Periprocedural valve dislodgment may occur during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).Ninety-eight consecutive patients underwent TAVI with the MCS after a comprehensive baseline assessment including invasive angiography, echocardiography, and Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (MSCT). The invasive monitoring charts and angiographic studies of all TAVI procedures were reviewed to determine the incidence and timing of valve dislodgment.Valve dislodgment occurred in 18 patients. Patients with valve dislodgment had a larger Aortic Valve Area (0.76 ± 0.25 cm(2) vs. 0.61 ± 0.19 cm(2) , P = 0.007), lower mean transaortic gradient (37.65 ± 14.62 mm Hg vs. 47.11 ± 16.08 mm Hg, P = 0.03) and significantly less aortic root calcification (Agatston score median 1951 AU (IQR, 799-3103) vs. 3289 AU (IQR 2097-4481), P = 0.016). A lower aortic root calcium score (Agatston score < 2359 AU) was the single independent predictor for valve dislodgment (OR 3.10, 1.09-8.84). After valve dislodgment, the valve could be successfully retrieved and implanted in the proper anatomic location in all cases. Valve dislodgment was associated with a lower incidence of post-procedural AR ≥ 2 (11.1% vs. 34.6%, P = 0.05). There were no relevant procedural or clinical implications to valve dislodgment.The incidence of periprocedural valve dislodgment was 18% in these series. Less aortic root calcification appeared the single independent predictor.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a disease that encompasses emphysema, chronic obstructive bronchitis and small airway obstruction and that is characterised by largely irreversible airflow obstruction, now affects around 10% of the population over the age of 40 yrs 1. The sixth commonest global cause of death in 1990, currently fourth in developed countries, it is expected rise to third place globally by 2020 2. This increase is linked to the trends of its foremost risk factor, tobacco consumption during the twentieth century, and will track the worldwide smoking trends of this century. Besides smoking cessation and pulmonary rehabilitation, the treatment of COPD has previously consisted of bronchodilators early in the disease and oxygen in the late stages. However, because of the presence of inflammation in COPD, short courses of systemic corticosteroids have been used for decades in the treatment of exacerbations, often along with antibiotics. Their side-effects, however, made them unsuitable for the long-term treatment of stable COPD. In the early 1980s, inhaled formulations of corticosteroids were shown to be highly effective for the treatment of asthma and were readily adopted in COPD with no scientific evidence of their benefit in this indication. This transition from asthma to COPD was so natural to prescribers that a Canadian survey conducted in 1994 found that one-third of patients admitted to hospital for COPD were already using inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) 3, despite the fact that no randomised controlled trials had evaluated their effectiveness in COPD. Today, market research studies estimate that the use of these drugs has increased to the point that they are used by >70% of patients with COPD in the USA and Europe, and are currently given as initial therapy to >50% of patients newly diagnosed with COPD, mostly in combination with a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) 4 …
The landmark Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial has aided in reducing the area of uncertainty in decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients with complex coronary artery disease. As part of the SYNTAX Trial, quantification of the coronary artery disease burden was prospectively undertaken by the Heart Team – consisting of at least an interventional cardiologist and cardiac surgeon – utilising the anatomical SYNTAX Score (www.syntaxscore.com) as a clinical tool in order to agree that equivalent anatomical revascularisation could be achieved. The anatomical SYNTAX Score is now advocated in both European and US revascularisation guidelines to guide decision-making between CABG and PCI as part of the SYNTAX pioneered Heart Team approach. In addition, the SYNTAX Trial has lead to the development and validation of the SYNTAX Score II, in which the anatomical SYNTAX Score was augmented with clinical variables, to allow for more objective and tailored decision making for the individual patient. Prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II tool is currently ongoing in the SYNTAX II (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02015832) and EXCEL (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01205776) trials. The present paper presents lessons learned from SYNTAX, including the development and/or validation of several SYNTAX based clinical tools, and the potential implications for current and future clinical practice.