Inhaled glucocorticosteroids have now become first-line therapy for the treatment of chronic asthma in many countries. They are the most effective asthma therapy currently available, and numerous studies have documented their long-term efficacy in asthma control in adults and in children. Inhaled steroids suppress inflammation in asthmatic airways, although their precise molecular mechanism of action is not yet certain. It is likely that steroids affect the transcription of several steroid-responsive genes, and, of particular importance, they may inhibit cytokine gene transcription and cytokine effects, thereby reducing the chronic inflammation in asthmatic airways. Inhaled steroids are now used at a much earlier stage in asthma therapy, and there is a strong argument for their early introduction in both adults and children to prevent asthma morbidity and mortality and possibly the structural changes resulting from uncontrolled chronic inflammation, which may lead to irreversible airflow obstruction in some patients. Of paramount importance is the question of safety as inhaled steroids are likely to be required for a long time. Local side effects caused by oropharyngeal deposition of the inhaled steroid may be reduced by the use of spacer devices and mouth-washing. Systemic side effects caused by gastrointestinal absorption of the fraction deposited in the oropharynx may also be reduced by these devices. There are differences in the systemic bioavailability of the different inhaled steroids currently in use, and inhaled steroids with the lowest bioavailability should be chosen when high doses of inhaled steroids are required for asthma control. Systemic side effects are usually observed only when daily doses of > 800 µ are inhaled, and whether effects on very sensitive biochemical indices are relevant to long-term deleterious effects is not yet certain. There is now overwhelming evidence that the doses of inhaled steroids required to control asthma in the majority of adults and children are safe and without systemic side effects. It is important to control asthma with the minimum dose of inhaled steroids possible, however. In the future it may be possible to develop inhaled steroids with even fewer systemic effects if the fraction absorbed from the respiratory tract can be rapidly metabolized in the bloodstream.
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
The prediction of the likely future state of cementitious materials has been the focus of research for many decades and has expanded to match the availability of computational power and of codes and data.The field has traditionally been divided into two activities and even communities; high and low temperature methods.By tradition, each community has favoured its own models, codes and data but recent developments are leaving this boundary less distinct than in the past.To compound this, is the wider adoption of methods complementary to thermodynamics, which makes modelling high temperature cement chemistry an exciting area in which to conduct research.What follows, is a very personal view of the major advances in modelling cement chemistry at high temperatures, the needs and drivers to model development and an equally personal speculation about areas of fruitful research and development in the foreseeable future.
Background Software to compute angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (angio-FFR) have been validated against pressure wire–derived fractional flow reserve (PW-FFR) with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.93 to 0.97. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic accuracies of 5 angio-FFR software/methods by an independent core lab in a prospective cohort of 390 vessels with carefully documented sites of PW-FFR and pressure wire–derived instantaneous wave-free ratio. Methods One “matcher investigator” colocalized on angiography the sites of pressure wire measurement with angio-FFR measurements and provided the same 2 optimal angiographic views and frame selection to independent analysts who were blinded to invasive physiological results and results from other software. The results were anonymized and randomly presented. The AUC of each angio-FFR was compared with 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) percent diameter stenosis (%DS) using a 2-tailed paired comparison of AUC. Results All 5 software/methods yielded a high proportion of analyzable vessels (A: 100%, B: 100%, C: 92.1%, D: 99.5%, and E: 92.1%). The AUCs for predicting fractional flow reserve ≤0.8 for software A, B, C, D, E, and 2-dimensional QCA %DS were 0.75, 0.74, 0.74, 0.73, 0.73, and 0.65, respectively. The AUC for each angio-FFR was significantly greater than that for 2-dimensional QCA %DS. Conclusions This head-to-head comparison by an independent core lab demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of various angio-FFR software for predicting PW-FFR ≤0.80 was useful, with a higher discrimination compared with 2-dimensional QCA %DS; however, it did not reach the diagnostic accuracy previously reported in validation studies of various vendors. Therefore, the intrinsic clinical value of “angiography-derived fractional flow reserve” requires confirmation in large clinical trials.
Macrophages (MΦ) are increased in COPD but are dysfunctional, possibly due to oxidative stress. To investigate this, monocyte derived MΦ (MDM) and tissue MΦ were exposed to cigarette smoke extract (CSE) or H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. MDM from non-smokers (NS), smokers (S) and COPD (n=4-8) were differentiated in GM or M-CSF. TMΦ were isolated from resected tissue (n=2-5). Cells were exposed to 30-300µM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> or 10-100% CSE ± 10ng/ml LPS for 24h. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay and cytokine release (CXCL8, TNFα, IL6, CCL2, IL10) by ELISA. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and CSE stimulated only CXCL8 release from all MDM (Table 1). CSE stimulated CXCL8 release from COPD TMΦ only. CSE inhibited LPS-stimulated release of TNFα, IL6, CCL2 and IL10 from all MΦ types. CSE and LPS were additive with CXCL8 from MDM but the opposite in TMΦ. Cytokine release from MΦ differed with CSE or H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with discrepancies between MDM and TMΦ.