6,963 publications from this institution
No abstract is provided for this article.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Glagov et al. showed that no reduction in vessel lumen occurred until the atherosclerotic plaque burden exceeded 40% of the vessel area. Most major adverse cardiac events occurring in the first 4 years after a myocardial infarction arise from untreated angiographically mild, non-flow-limiting lesions at the time of the index event. We report how computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography (CCTA) can be used to non-invasively risk stratify a patient with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and guide further management.A 69-year-old non-smoking female with hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and hypothyroidism presented with atypical chest pain. Electrocardiogram and left ventricular ejection fraction were normal. Her lipidic profile was normal. CCTA showed a lipid-rich plaque with very low attenuation (<30 HU) in the left main stem (LMS) extending into the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and in the mid LAD artery. The maximum plaque burden in the LMS was 67% with a remodelling index of 1.375, and an area stenosis of 22%. Tissue characterization showed a lipid-rich plaque with a thin fibrous cap. The perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) in the proximal LAD was suggestive of (-69 HU) inflamed perivascular fat. Shear stress analysis of the LMS plaque showed normal wall shear stress (WSS); however, the axial plaque stress was high. Her medications were intensified to rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily (OD) and ezetimibe 10 mg OD. The patient remained asymptomatic at 6 months follow-up.Our case exemplifies the value of CCTA as a diagnostic 'one-stop shop' (CCTA, finite element analysis, computed tomographic density [CTD], tissue characterization analysis, FAI analysis, WSS and wall strain, and etc.) when stratifying a patient with non-obstructive CAD. With further development of novel potent anti-lipidaemic and anti-inflammatory drugs, non-obstructive lesions with adverse plaque and haemodynamic parameters will have the opportunity to be treated with additional preventive pharmacological therapy.
A cardiologist recounts attending a 1994 FDA panel meeting where data on early coronary stent trials was presented and a bioresorbable scaffold was approved based on randomized evidence and input from patients and physicians.
BACKGROUND Late angiographic narrowing has been observed following coronary implantation of the Wallstent. To identify the angiographic variables that predict restenosis within the stented segment, a retrospective study of data from the European Wallstent core laboratory was performed. METHODS AND RESULTS Follow-up angiograms (excluding patients with in-hospital occlusions) were analyzed for 214 lesions in 176 patients (78% restudy rate). The incidence of restenosis within the stented segment was 35% by lesion and 35% by patient for criterion 1 (greater than or equal to 0.72 mm loss in minimal luminal diameter) and 24% by lesion and 24% by patient for criterion 2 (diameter stenosis greater than or equal to 50% at follow-up). The association between 16 variables and restenosis was determined by a relative risk ratio assessment. Variables with significant risk ratios for restenosis with criterion 1 were use of multiple stents/lesion (relative risk, 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.25) and oversized (unconstrained stent diameter exceeding reference diameter greater than 0.7 mm) stents (relative risk, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.10-2.45), and for criterion 2, oversizing by more than 0.70 mm (relative risk, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.13-3.31), bypass grafts (relative risk, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.98-2.66), use of multiple stents/lesion (relative risk, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.97-2.67) and residual diameter stenosis more than 20% post stenting (relative risk, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.91-2.50). CONCLUSIONS It is concluded that several angiographic variables are significantly associated with late angiographic narrowing after stenting in the coronary arteries. We suggest that stent operators avoid excessive oversizing in the selection of stent diameter and the use of multiple stents per lesion to lessen the risk of late restenosis.